Effects of Different Types of Tasks on Junior ELT Students' Use of Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication

This study describes the use of communication strategies in a synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment and examine whether task type has an influence on the frequency and variety of communication strategies (CS) used in this environment. To this end, use of CSs in three different communicative task types: jigsaw, decision-making and opinion-exchange were examined, based on and adapted from DA¶rnyei and Scott’s (1997) and Smith’s (2003) CS taxonomies. The data for this study was collected from 36 junior ELT students studying in a Turkish university. The results showed that the participants made use of a variety of CSs that were previously observed in face-to-face communication, and they used some CSs which are peculiar to CMC environment. It was also found that task type affected the frequency and type of CS used, favoring jigsaw task types in resulting more use of CSs.

[1]  Shuai Li,et al.  Engaging Language Learners Through Technology Integration: Theory, Applications and Outcomes , 2014 .

[2]  Lina Lee,et al.  Promoting intercultural exchanges with blogs and podcasting: a study of Spanish–American telecollaboration , 2009 .

[3]  Marisol Fernández-García,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning in Nonnative Speaker-Nonnative Speaker Synchronous Discussions , 2013 .

[4]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  Strategic competence and how to teach it , 1991 .

[5]  Lina Lee,et al.  Enhancing Learners' Communication Skills through Synchronous Electronic Interaction and Task‐Based Instruction , 2002 .

[6]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[7]  Mark Darhower.  Interactional Features of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A Sociocultural Case Study , 2013 .

[8]  Olaf Böhlke.  A Comparison of Students Participation Levels by Group Size and Language Stages during Chatroom and Face-to-Face Discussions in German. , 2013 .

[9]  Richard G. Kern.  Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production , 1995 .

[10]  A. U. Chamot.  LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION: CURRENT ISSUES AND RESEARCH , 2005, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[11]  Klaus Schwienhorst,et al.  Evaluating Tandem Language Learning in the MOO: Discourse Repair Strategies in a Bilingual Internet Project , 2002 .

[12]  Bryan Smith,et al.  The Use of Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2003 .

[13]  Maiga Chang,et al.  Learning Culture and Language through ICTs: Methods for Enhanced Instruction , 2009 .

[14]  Bryan Smith.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATED INTERACTION AND LEXICAL ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Lara Lomicka,et al.  A Case Study of Learner Interaction in Technology-Enhanced Language Learning Environments , 2000 .

[16]  Markus Kötter,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning and Codeswitching in Online Tandems , 2003 .

[17]  Si Chen.  A Study of Communication Strategies in Interlanguage Production by Chinese EFL Learners , 1990 .

[18]  Z. Dörnyei,et al.  Review Article Communication Strategies in a Second Language: Definitions and Taxonomies , 1997 .

[19]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[20]  Pauline Foster.  A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning. , 1998 .

[21]  Zsuzsanna I. Abrams.  Computer-mediated communication and group journals: expanding the repertoire of participant roles , 2001 .

[22]  Jill Pellettieri,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence , 2000 .

[23]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Learner participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: an exploratory case study , 2010, ReCALL.

[24]  Robert J. Blake,et al.  Computer Mediated Communication: A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage , 2000 .

[25]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication , 2000 .

[26]  Wei-Peng Lien,et al.  Using Blended Learning to Teach Foreign Brides Chinese , 2009 .

[27]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[29]  Lina Lee,et al.  Online interaction: negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish , 2001, ReCALL.

[30]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[31]  Tahereh Paribakht,et al.  Strategic Competence and Language Proficiency , 1985 .

[32]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[33]  Jannie Roed.  Language Learner Behaviour in a Virtual Environment , 2003 .

[34]  Orlando R. Kelm.  The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[35]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Non-Native Speaker Interaction Management Strategies in a Network-Based Virtual Environment. , 2008 .

[36]  Paula Garrett-Rucks.  Investigating Optimal Computer-Mediated Cultural Instruction to Foster Intercultural Sensitivity in Online Peer Discussions , 2014 .

[37]  Nanda Poulisse,et al.  Communication Strategies in L1 and L2: Same or Different?1 , 1989 .

[38]  P. Skehan.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TASK-BASED INSTRUCTION , 1996 .