The role of motifs in understanding behavior in social and engineered networks

Within networks one can identify motifs that are significant recurring patterns of interaction between nodes. Here motifs are sub-graphs that occur more frequently than would be explained by random connections. Graphs can be used to model internal network structures of human groups, or links between groups, with group dynamics being governed by these structures. Graphs can also model behavior in engineered systems, and internal network structures can significantly affect dynamic behavior. A graph may only be partially visible (such as in hostile or coalition environments), however detectable network motifs may in some cases be reflective of the entire graph. We outline a research plan and describe basic network motifs and their properties, along with current analytic techniques for static and dynamic settings. We offer suggestions as to how network motif techniques can be applied to intra- or inter- group behavior, for example to detect whether multiple groups behave as a co-operative alliance, or whether coalition networks inter-operate in positive ways. As an example, we examine a complex time-series graph dataset relevant to coalition focused aspects of the class of networks under study, specifically related to the social network resulting from the authorship of academic papers within a coalition. We provide details of the basic analysis of this network over time and outline how this can be used as one of the datasets for our planned network motif research activities, especially with regards to the temporal and evolutionary aspects.

[1]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Minfer: A method of inferring motif statistics from sampled edges , 2016, 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[3]  Sean F. Everton Disrupting Dark Networks , 2012 .

[4]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[5]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[6]  Robert W. Faris,et al.  Toxic Ties , 2016 .

[7]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[8]  Valdis E. Krebs,et al.  Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells , 2001 .

[9]  N. Contractor,et al.  The Effects of Diversity and Network Ties on Innovations , 2015, The American behavioral scientist.

[10]  Gavin Pearson,et al.  Intra-group Tension Under Inter-group Conflict: A Generative Model Using Group Social Norms and Identity , 2017, AHFE.

[11]  Diane Felmlee,et al.  The Social Networks of Cyberbullying on Twitter , 2017, Int. J. Technoethics.

[12]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004 .

[14]  Martina Morris,et al.  ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[15]  Robert W. Faris,et al.  Casualties of Social Combat , 2014 .

[16]  Don Towsley,et al.  Inferring Higher-Order Structure Statistics of Large Networks from Sampled Edges , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[17]  Martina Morris,et al.  Specification of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Computational Aspects. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[18]  Shyhtsun Felix Wu,et al.  The Evolution of Ego-Centric Triads: A Microscopic Approach toward Predicting Macroscopic Network Properties , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[19]  P. Holland,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Local Structure in Social Networks , 1974 .

[20]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Motifs in Temporal Networks , 2016, WSDM.

[21]  Tien Pham,et al.  Controlled English to facilitate human/machine analytical processing , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[22]  Babak Heydari,et al.  Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition , 2016, Scientific Reports.