Accurate Measurement of Cartilage Morphology Using a 3D Laser Scanner

We describe a method to accurately assess articular cartilage morphology using the three-dimensional laser scanning technology. Traditional methods to obtain ground truth for validating the assessment of cartilage morphology from MR images have relied on water displacement, anatomical sections obtained with a high precision band saw, stereophotogrammetry, manual segmentation, and phantoms of known geometry. However, these methods are either limited to overall measurements such as volume and area, require an extensive setup and a highly skilled operator, or are prone to artifacts due to tissue sectioning. Alternatively, 3D laser scanning is an established technology that can provide high resolution range images of cartilage and bone surfaces. We present a method to extract these surfaces from scanned range images, register them spatially, and combine them into a single surface representing the articular cartilage from which volume, area, and thickness can be computed. We validated the laser scanning approach using a knee model which was covered with a synthetic articular cartilage model and compared the computed volume against water displacement measurements. Using this method, the volume of articular cartilage in five sets of cadaver knees was compared to volume estimates obtained from segmentation of MR images.

[1]  Steve Marschner,et al.  Filling holes in complex surfaces using volumetric diffusion , 2002, Proceedings. First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission.

[2]  Seokbae Son,et al.  Automated laser scanning system for reverse engineering and inspection , 2002 .

[3]  V C Mow,et al.  Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Greg Turk,et al.  Simplification and Repair of Polygonal Models Using Volumetric Techniques , 2003, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[5]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[6]  P A Dieppe,et al.  No loss of cartilage volume over three years in patients with knee osteoarthritis as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  Colin Bradley,et al.  Reverse engineering employing a 3D laser scanner: A case study , 1996 .

[8]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Allen Van Gelder Efficient Computation of Polygon Area and Polyhedron Volume , 1995 .

[11]  Thomas H. Berquist,et al.  Imaging of articular pathology: MRI, CT, arthrography , 1997 .

[12]  Z A C,et al.  Knee cartilage topography , thickness , and contact areas from MRI : in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements , 1999 .

[13]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[14]  J. Reginster,et al.  The prevalence and burden of arthritis. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[15]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  P A Hardy,et al.  Measuring the thickness of articular cartilage from MR images , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Tao Ju,et al.  Robust repair of polygonal models , 2004, ACM Trans. Graph..