Response of contrast agents to ultrasound.

Microbubbles are used as ultrasonic contrast agents that enhance the ultrasound signals of the vascular bed. The recent development of site-targeted microbubbles opened up the possibility for molecular imaging as well as localised drug and gene delivery. Initially the microbubbles' physical properties and their response to the ultrasound beam were not fully understood. However, the introduction of fast acquisition microscopy has allowed the observation of the microbubble behaviour in the presence of ultrasound. In addition, acoustical techniques can determine the scatter of single microbubbles. Sonoporation experiments promise high-specificity drug and gene delivery, but the responsible physical mechanisms, particularly for in vivo applications, are not fully understood. An improvement of microbubble technology may address variability related problems in both imaging and drug/gene delivery.

[1]  Werner Lauterborn,et al.  Numerical investigation of nonlinear oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1976 .

[2]  Lohse,et al.  Bubble shape oscillations and the onset of sonoluminescence. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[3]  A. Brayman,et al.  A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Dayton,et al.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[6]  W N McDicken,et al.  Contrast agent stability: a continuous B-mode imaging approach. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Thierry Bettinger,et al.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[8]  J. H. Rose,et al.  Experimental determination of phase velocity of perfluorocarbons: Applications to targeted contrast agents , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  P M Shankar,et al.  Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  A. Kabalnov,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[13]  D. A. Foley,et al.  Destruction of contrast microbubbles during ultrasound imaging at conventional power output. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[15]  R. Meltzer,et al.  Effect of viscosity on the size of microbubbles generated for use as echocardiographic contrast agents , 1986 .

[16]  R. Guy,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: influence of contrast agent on transfection. , 2007, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[17]  P. Dayton,et al.  Effect of coupled oscillations on microbubble behavior. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasound Imaging of Inflammation Using Microbubbles Targeted to Activated Leukocytes , 2000, Circulation.

[19]  E. Carstensen,et al.  "Stable" inertial cavitation. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  K. Shung,et al.  Quantitative measurements of second harmonic Doppler using ultrasound contrast agents. , 1996, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[21]  W. McDicken,et al.  Nanointerrogation of ultrasonic contrast agent microbubbles using atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Zhang Dong,et al.  The viscoelasticity of lipid shell and the hysteresis of subharmonic in liquid containing microbubbles , 2006 .

[23]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part two: measurements , 1994 .

[24]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[25]  Junru Wu,et al.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  J. G. Miller,et al.  A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. , 1996, Circulation.

[28]  V. Newhouse,et al.  Second harmonic characteristics of the ultrasound contrast agents albunex and FSO69. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  N de Jong,et al.  Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. , 1991, Ultrasonics.

[30]  A. Weyman,et al.  Pulsatile pressure affects the disappearance of echocardiographic contrast agents. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[31]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[32]  Jens M. Hovem,et al.  Experimental observation of subharmonic oscillations in Infoson bubbles , 1996 .

[33]  A. Weyman,et al.  Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[34]  E. Stride,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of the behaviour of ultrasound contrast agent particles in whole blood. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  K V Ramnarine,et al.  Understanding the limitations of ultrasonic backscatter measurements from microbubble populations. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  N de Jong,et al.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[38]  Ghaleb A Husseini,et al.  Micelles and nanoparticles for ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[39]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Broadband time-domain reflectometry measurement of attenuation and phase velocity in highly attenuating suspensions with application to the ultrasound contrast medium Albunex. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Victor Frenkel,et al.  Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[41]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Method for Microbubble Characterization Using Primary Radiation Force , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[42]  S. Kaul,et al.  Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  S. Wickline,et al.  Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[44]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: a numerical study. , 2005 .

[45]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[46]  M. Longo,et al.  Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles: Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length , 2002 .

[47]  N de Jong,et al.  Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[48]  J. Wu,et al.  Experimental study of stability of a contrast agent in an ultrasound field. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[49]  M. Longo,et al.  Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[50]  K. Ferrara,et al.  Dynamics and fragmentation of thick-shelled microbubbles , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[51]  M. Minnaert XVI.On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water , 1933 .

[52]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[53]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of individual microbubbles of an ultrasound contrast agent: fundamental and pulse inversion imaging. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[54]  K. Ferrara,et al.  The natural frequency of nonlinear oscillation of ultrasound contrast agents in microvessels. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[55]  E Stride,et al.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: A review , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[56]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Asymmetric oscillation of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents. , 2005, Applied physics letters.

[57]  P. Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[58]  T. Matula,et al.  Using light scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Sound radiation of 3-MHz driven gas bubbles , 1997 .

[60]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Imaging of Free-Floating and Targeted Bubbles , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[61]  P. Dayton,et al.  Observation of contrast agent response to chirp insonation with a simultaneous optical-acoustical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[62]  W. O’Brien Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[63]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles. , 2005, Medical physics.

[64]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[65]  E. Wisner,et al.  The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[66]  K. Vokurka,et al.  On Rayleigh's model of a freely oscillating bubble. I. Basic relations , 1985 .

[67]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[68]  J. Mobley,et al.  Broadband measurements of the attenuation coefficient and backscatter coefficient for suspensions: A potential calibration tool , 1997 .

[69]  A. Bouakaz,et al.  Simulations and measurements of optical images of insonified ultrasound contrast microbubbles , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[70]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[71]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Using Leukocyte-Targeted Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Circulation.

[72]  Anthony I. Eller,et al.  Generation of Subharmonics of Order One‐Half by Bubbles in a Sound Field , 1968 .

[73]  F Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[74]  K. Shung,et al.  An approach for measuring ultrasonic backscattering from biological tissues with focused transducers , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[75]  Michael S. Hughes,et al.  Frequency and concentration dependence of the backscatter coefficient of the ultrasound contrast agent Albunex , 1998 .

[76]  John Tsamopoulos,et al.  Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 2. Response to an oscillatory pressure field , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[77]  Nico de Jong,et al.  The onset of microbubble vibration. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[78]  T. Porter,et al.  Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Demonstration and potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[79]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[80]  J. G. Miller,et al.  In vitro characterization of a novel, tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic microscopy. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[81]  V. Newhouse,et al.  Simulated Capillary Blood Flow Measurement Using a Nonlinear Ultrasonic Contrast Agent1 , 1992 .

[82]  R. Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasonic gene and drug delivery to the cardiovascular system. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[83]  W. McDicken,et al.  An in vitro study of a microbubble contrast agent using a clinical ultrasound imaging system. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[84]  F Forsberg,et al.  Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[85]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[86]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging , 2007 .

[87]  D. Adam,et al.  On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[88]  F Forsberg,et al.  Galactose‐based intravenous sonographic contrast agent: experimental studies , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[89]  W N McDicken,et al.  The dependence of ultrasound contrast agents backscatter on acoustic pressure: theory versus experiment. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[90]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[91]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[92]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages. , 2001, Ultrasonics.

[93]  A. Prosperetti Application of the subharmonic threshold to the measurement of the damping of oscillating gas bubbles , 1977 .

[94]  N. Amso,et al.  Contrast agent bubble and erythrocyte behavior in a 1.5-MHz standing ultrasound wave. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[95]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[96]  W N McDicken,et al.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[97]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[98]  T. Tuziuti,et al.  Bubble motions confined in a microspace observed with stroboscopic technique. , 2007, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.

[99]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[100]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  On the destruction of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[101]  L. Masotti,et al.  Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[102]  F Forsberg,et al.  Quantitative acoustic characterization of a new surfactant-based ultrasound contrast agent. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[103]  K. Shung,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of AlbunexR, a new contrast agent , 1990 .

[104]  D. Dalecki WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: bioeffects of ultrasound contrast agents in vivo. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[105]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Albumin microbubble echo-contrast material as an enhancer for ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis. , 1995, Circulation.

[106]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[107]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[108]  V. Uhlendorf,et al.  Nonlinear acoustical response of coated microbubbles in diagnostic ultrasound , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[109]  A. Needles,et al.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[110]  D. Khismatullin Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[111]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[112]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Ultrasound for drug and gene delivery to the brain. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[113]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  High-frequency color flow imaging of the microcirculation , 2000 .

[114]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Frequency and pressure dependent attenuation and scattering by microbubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[115]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction Can Repeatedly Direct Highly Specific Plasmid Expression to the Heart , 2003, Circulation.

[116]  V L Newhouse,et al.  Second harmonic ultrasonic blood perfusion measurement. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[117]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[118]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice--initial results. , 2003, Radiology.

[119]  Douglas L. Miller Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[120]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[121]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[122]  M. Burkard,et al.  Behavior of Bubbles of Slowly Permeating Gas Used for Ultrasonic Imaging Contrast , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[123]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrasound-induced gas release from contrast agent microbubbles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[124]  J. Zagzebski,et al.  Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[125]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Different effects of microbubble destruction and translation in Doppler measurements , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[126]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[127]  J. Riess,et al.  Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[128]  Nico de Jong,et al.  SCATTERING PROPERTIES OF ENCAPSULATED GAS BUBBLES AT HIGH ULTRASOUND PRESSURES , 1999 .

[129]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[130]  W. McDicken,et al.  Quantification of the enhanced backscatter phenomenon from an intravenous and an intra-arterial contrast agent. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[131]  W N McDicken,et al.  An in vitro comparison of ultrasonic contrast agents in solutions with varying air levels. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[132]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[133]  A. Nadim,et al.  Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids , 2002 .

[134]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of resonant cavitation bubbles in a flow tube by their second-harmonic emissions , 1981 .

[135]  F Forsberg,et al.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[136]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantitation of perfusion. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[137]  S. Kaul,et al.  Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[138]  W N McDicken,et al.  Nanomechanical probing of microbubbles using the atomic force microscope. , 2007, Ultrasonics.

[139]  J. Wu,et al.  Measurements of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of contrast agents. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[140]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[141]  D. Lohse,et al.  Sound scattering and localized heat deposition of pulse-driven microbubbles , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[142]  W. McDicken,et al.  An in vitro system for the study of ultrasound contrast agents using a commercial imaging system. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[143]  W. McDicken,et al.  Acoustic Rayleigh scattering at individual micron-sized bubbles , 2007 .

[144]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[145]  L. Masotti,et al.  Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[146]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[147]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[148]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[149]  J. Roelandt,et al.  Quantification of transpulmonary echocontrast effects. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[150]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[151]  Bernhard Wolfrum,et al.  Observations of pressure-wave-excited contrast agent bubbles in the vicinity of cells , 2002 .

[152]  E. Unger,et al.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[153]  D. Miller,et al.  The relationship of scattered subharmonic, 3.3-MHz fundamental and second harmonic signals to damage of monolayer cells by ultrasonically activated Albunex. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[154]  Shao-ling Huang,et al.  Liposomes in ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[155]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[156]  S S Segal,et al.  The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: a basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Circulation research.

[157]  Meng-Xing Tang,et al.  Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[158]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[159]  M. S. Plesset,et al.  On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid-gas solutions , 1950 .

[160]  W N McDicken,et al.  Evaluation of an experimental system for the in vitro assessment of ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[161]  S Otto,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[162]  J. Lindner Evolving applications for contrast ultrasound. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[163]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[164]  P. Burns,et al.  Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[165]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[166]  D. May,et al.  Nondestructive subharmonic imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[167]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[168]  E. A. Neppiras Subharmonic and Other Low‐Frequency Emission from Gas Bubbles in Sound‐Irradiated Liquids , 1968 .

[169]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Trapping and manipulation of microscopic bubbles with a scanning optical tweezer , 2006 .

[170]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames , 2003 .

[171]  P. Dayton,et al.  Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[172]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[173]  N. Bom,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the hydrostatic pressure in a fluid-filled cavity based on the disappearance time of micrometer-sized free gas bubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[174]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[175]  John Tsamopoulos,et al.  Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 1. Response to a step change in pressure , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.