Asymmetry and Symmetry in the Beauty of Human Faces

The emphasis in the published literature has mostly been on symmetry as the critical source for beauty judgment. In fact, both symmetry and asymmetry serve as highly aesthetic sources of beauty, whether the context is perceptual or conceptual. The human brain is characterized by symbolic cognition and this type of cognition facilitates a range of aesthetic reactions. For example, both art and natural scenery contain asymmetrical elements, which nevertheless render the whole effect beautiful. A further good case in point is, in fact, human faces. Normally, faces are structurally left-right symmetrical content-wise but not size-wise or function-wise. Attractiveness has often been discussed in terms of content-wise full-face symmetry. To test whether or not attractiveness can be gleaned only from the presence of left-right full-faces we tested half faces. Three separate groups of participants viewed and rated the attractiveness of 56 full-faces (women’s and men’s), their 56 vertical left hemi-faces and 56 vertical right hemi-faces. We found no statistically significant differences in the attractiveness ratings of full- and hemi-faces (whether left or right). Instead, we found a strong and significant positive correlation between the ratings of the hemi- and full-faces. These results are consistent with the view that the underpinning of human facial beauty is complex and that bilateral symmetry does not constitute a principle factor in beauty assessment. We discuss that the highly evolved human brain, compared to other animals, as well as symbolic and abstract cognition in humans enable a wide variety of aesthetic reactions.

[1]  A. Zee,et al.  Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics , 1986 .

[2]  D. Zaidel,et al.  Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  P. Drummond,et al.  Staring at one side of the face increases blood flow on that side of the face. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Achim Müller,et al.  The Beauty of Symmetry , 2003, Science.

[5]  S. D. Johnson,et al.  Some pollinators do not prefer symmetrically marked or shaped daisy (Asteraceae) flowers , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Toshikazu Hasegawa,et al.  Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Dahlia W. Zaidel,et al.  Different organization of concepts and meaning systems in the two cerebral hemispheres , 2000 .

[9]  V F Ferrario,et al.  The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  Stefan Wolfart,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Visual Impact of Symmetry Increases Significantly Towards the Midline , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  D I Perrett,et al.  Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  Audrey Chen,et al.  Brain asymmetry and facial attractiveness: Facial beauty is not simply in the eye of the beholder , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  D. Zaidel,et al.  Functional asymmetry in the human face: Perception of health in the left and right sides of the face , 2001, Laterality.

[14]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  Hemiface contributions to hemispheric dominance in visual speech perception. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[15]  R. Sperry Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[16]  Peter T. Ellison Beauty: In the gonads of the beholder — and the beheld , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[17]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Facial Aesthetics: Babies Prefer Attractiveness to Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[18]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Visual signalling by asymmetry: a review of perceptual processes. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Aneta Stefanovska,et al.  Left-right asymmetry of the facial microvascular control , 2006, Clinical Autonomic Research.

[21]  Peter Kosso,et al.  Symmetry arguments in physics , 1999 .

[22]  A. Little,et al.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Loren E. Babcock Asymmetry in the fossil record , 2005, European Review.

[24]  Yuji Moro,et al.  Facial Asymmetry and Attractiveness Judgment in Developmental Perspective , 2001 .

[25]  Martin Stevens,et al.  The protective value of conspicuous signals is not impaired by shape, size, or position asymmetry , 2009 .

[26]  Gideon Engler,et al.  Einstein, his theories, and his aesthetic considerations , 2005 .

[27]  L. Rogers,et al.  Lateralized use of the mouth in production of vocalizations by marmosets , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Jason Keagy,et al.  Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Achim Müller,et al.  Chemistry. The beauty of symmetry. , 2003, Science.

[30]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[32]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[33]  Innes C Cuthill,et al.  The predation costs of symmetrical cryptic coloration , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  K. Grammer,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality , 2006 .

[35]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[36]  A. Palmer,et al.  Animal asymmetry , 2009, Current Biology.

[37]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  A. Møller,et al.  Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  B Skvarilová,et al.  Facial asymmetry: an X-ray study. , 1994, Acta chirurgiae plasticae.

[40]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategies of Human Mating , 2006 .

[41]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Asymmetry of Facial Expression in Spontaneous Emotion , 1984, Cortex.

[42]  John Stillwell,et al.  Symmetry , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[43]  Asif A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Specialized processing of primate facial and vocal expressions: evidence for cerebral asymmetries. , 2002 .

[44]  L. Farkas,et al.  Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[45]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Michael E. R. Nicholls,et al.  Asymmetries for the visual expression and perception of speech , 2006, Brain and Language.

[47]  D. Zaidel,et al.  ATTRACTIVENESS OF NATURAL FACES COMPARED TO COMPUTER CONSTRUCTED PERFECTLY SYMMETRICAL FACES , 2007, The International journal of neuroscience.

[48]  M. Hauser,et al.  Asymmetries in the timing of facial and vocal expressions by rhesus monkeys: implications for hemispheric specialization , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  A. Palmer,et al.  Waltzing with Asymmetry , 1996 .

[52]  Yuriko Saito,et al.  The Japanese aesthetics of imperfection and insufficiency , 1997 .

[53]  D. Zaidel,et al.  THE FACE, BEAUTY, AND SYMMETRY: PERCEIVING ASYMMETRY IN BEAUTIFUL FACES , 2005, The International journal of neuroscience.

[54]  A. Little,et al.  The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Michael F. Marra A History of Modern Japanese Aesthetics , 2001 .

[56]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Left-sided oral asymmetries in spontaneous but not posed smiles , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Ezatollah Hazrati Distance from symmetry: A three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. , 1996 .

[58]  Ruth Mace,et al.  On Becoming Modern , 2009, Science.

[59]  Dahlia W. Zaidel,et al.  Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[60]  Harold A. Sackeim,et al.  Asymmetry of the Face at Rest: Size, Area and Emotional Expression , 1984, Cortex.

[61]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[62]  Joan C. Borod,et al.  Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: A review of the normal adult literature , 1997, Neuropsychology Review.

[63]  A. Juniper,et al.  Wabi Sabi: The Japanese Art of Impermanence , 2003 .

[64]  Kevin W. Dufour,et al.  Reproductive consequences of bilateral asymmetry for individual male red-winged blackbirds , 1998 .

[65]  Robert Wicks,et al.  The Idealization of Contingency in Traditional Japanese Aesthetics , 2005 .

[66]  V. Ferrario,et al.  A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry. , 1995, Journal of anatomy.

[67]  Dahlia W. Zaidel,et al.  She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  J. Zilhão,et al.  The Emergence of Ornaments and Art: An Archaeological Perspective on the Origins of “Behavioral Modernity” , 2007 .

[69]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[70]  M. Ritchie,et al.  The shape of female mating preferences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  W. Hopkins,et al.  Asymmetry in facial expression of emotions by chimpanzees , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[73]  Gideon Engler,et al.  AESTHETICS IN SCIENCE AND IN ART , 1990 .

[74]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[75]  William M. Burke Beauty and Evolution , 2003 .

[76]  A. Little,et al.  Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[77]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[78]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species , 2008, PloS one.

[79]  J. Madden,et al.  Sex, bowers and brains , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  A Quantitative Three-Dimensional Assessment of Soft Tissue Facial Asymmetry of Cleft Lip and Palate Adult Patients , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[81]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  The Ant and the Peacock , 1992 .

[82]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Same-Sex Gaze Attraction Influences Mate-Choice Copying in Humans , 2010, PloS one.