An Urn Model for Odds-Ratio-Based Response-Adaptive Phase III Clinical Trials for Two or More Treatments

Adaptive data-dependent allocation designs are used in phase III clinical trials having two or more competing treatments with sequential entrance of patients, in order to allocate a larger number of patients to the better treatment. The odds ratio is a popular concept for biomedical practitioners; hence, odds-ratio-based adaptive designs could be very useful in practice. Rosenberger et al. (2001) introduced an odds-ratio-based two-treatment response-adaptive design; however, they did not study the properties in details. In this article, we describe these designs by means of urn models and provide limiting results for them. Some properties of the design are also studied numerically. We compare the performance of the proposed design with some possible competitors with respect to a few criteria. A real dataset is used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed design. Thus, we provide a base for using odds-ratio-based response-adaptive designs in practice. We extend our design for covariates and also for more than two treatments. In particular, we study the three-treatment design in this article.

[1]  A. Biswas,et al.  Drop-the-loser design in the presence of covariates , 2009 .

[2]  ALLOCATION BY RANDOMIZED PLAY-THE-WINNER RULE IN THE PRESENCE OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS , 2002 .

[3]  Douglas E. Faries,et al.  A Case Study of an Adaptive Clinical Trial in the Treatment of Out-Patients with Depressive Disorder , 1994 .

[4]  A. Biswas,et al.  A RANDOMIZED LONGITUDINAL PLAY‐THE‐WINNER DESIGN FOR REPEATED BINARY DATA , 2004 .

[5]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Generalized Polya's Urn Design for Sequential Medical Trials , 1979 .

[6]  W. Rosenberger,et al.  COVARIATE-ADJUSTED RESPONSE-ADAPTIVE DESIGNS FOR BINARY RESPONSE , 2001, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[7]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Implementing Optimal Allocation in Sequential Binary Response Experiments , 2007 .

[8]  M. Zelen,et al.  Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial , 1969 .

[9]  D. Dixon.  Bayesian methods and ethics in a clinical trial design , 1997 .

[10]  Gopal K. Basak,et al.  Weak convergence of recursions , 1997 .

[11]  S. Ethier,et al.  Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence , 2005 .

[12]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Randomized Play-the-Winner Rule in Medical Trials , 1978 .

[13]  Quentin F. Stout,et al.  Exact computational analyses for adaptive designs , 1995 .

[14]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability , 2003 .

[15]  J. Kadane,et al.  Bayesian methods and ethics in a clinical trial design , 1997 .

[16]  R. G. Cornell,et al.  Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. , 1985, Pediatrics.

[17]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Bayesian methods and ethics in a clinical trial design , 1996 .

[18]  K. Athreya,et al.  Embedding of Urn Schemes into Continuous Time Markov Branching Processes and Related Limit Theorems , 1968 .

[19]  W. Rosenberger,et al.  The theory of response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials , 2006 .