Personalized circulating tumor DNA analysis to detect residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer

A robust personalized ctDNA test, TARDIS, achieves high accuracy for residual disease after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Early detection, no time travel needed Analysis of tumor DNA shed into a patient’s circulation can provide a noninvasive means of detecting the presence of a tumor and analyzing its DNA for targetable mutations. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to detect small amounts of tumor DNA in the blood, especially in patients who have already undergone initial chemotherapy treatment. To address this problem, McDonald et al. developed a method of targeted digital sequencing (TARDIS), which is customized for each patient but can then be used to monitor the patient over time for and allow early detection of tumor recurrence. Longitudinal analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise for monitoring treatment response. However, most current methods lack adequate sensitivity for residual disease detection during or after completion of treatment in patients with nonmetastatic cancer. To address this gap and to improve sensitivity for minute quantities of residual tumor DNA in plasma, we have developed targeted digital sequencing (TARDIS) for multiplexed analysis of patient-specific cancer mutations. In reference samples, by simultaneously analyzing 8 to 16 known mutations, TARDIS achieved 91 and 53% sensitivity at mutant allele fractions (AFs) of 3 in 104 and 3 in 105, respectively, with 96% specificity, using input DNA equivalent to a single tube of blood. We successfully analyzed up to 115 mutations per patient in 80 plasma samples from 33 women with stage I to III breast cancer. Before treatment, TARDIS detected ctDNA in all patients with 0.11% median AF. After completion of neoadjuvant therapy, ctDNA concentrations were lower in patients who achieved pathological complete response (pathCR) compared to patients with residual disease (median AFs, 0.003 and 0.017%, respectively, P = 0.0057, AUC = 0.83). In addition, patients with pathCR showed a larger decrease in ctDNA concentrations during neoadjuvant therapy. These results demonstrate high accuracy for assessment of molecular response and residual disease during neoadjuvant therapy using ctDNA analysis. TARDIS has achieved up to 100-fold improvement beyond the current limit of ctDNA detection using clinically relevant blood volumes, demonstrating that personalized ctDNA tracking could enable individualized clinical management of patients with cancer treated with curative intent.

[1]  P. Spellman,et al.  Circulating tumor DNA dynamics using patient-customized assays are associated with outcome in neoadjuvantly treated breast cancer , 2019, Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies.

[2]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Circulating Tumor DNA in HER2-Amplified Breast Cancer: A Translational Research Substudy of the NeoALTTO Phase III Trial , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  Winnie S. Liang,et al.  Abstract PD2-01: Personalized serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in high-risk early stage breast cancer patients to monitor and predict response to neoadjuvant therapy and outcome in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL , 2019, Poster Discussion Abstracts.

[4]  R. Scharpf,et al.  Dynamics of Tumor and Immune Responses during Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Cancer research.

[5]  Rafael C. Schulman,et al.  Abstract 3247: Genome-wide cell-free DNA mutation integration for sensitive cancer detection , 2018, Prevention Research.

[6]  Virginia G Kaklamani,et al.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21‐Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Reducing Overtreatment of Cancer With Precision Medicine: Just What the Doctor Ordered. , 2018, JAMA.

[8]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test , 2018, Science.

[9]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Serial circulating tumour DNA analysis during multimodality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective biomarker study , 2018, Gut.

[10]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  Association of Cell-Free DNA Tumor Fraction and Somatic Copy Number Alterations With Survival in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling. , 2017, Cancer Discovery.

[12]  J. Ajani,et al.  Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival—The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience , 2017, Cancer.

[13]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  MA 11.02 Circulating Tumor DNA in Early Stage NSCLC: High Sensitivity Analysis in Low Burden Disease. LUCID Study Update , 2017 .

[14]  Sam Angiuoli,et al.  Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[15]  Ashwini Naik,et al.  Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early stage lung cancer evolution , 2017, Nature.

[16]  Winnie S. Liang,et al.  Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[17]  Mei Liu,et al.  Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Patient-Specific Circulating Tumor DNA Detection during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  R. Strausberg,et al.  Circulating tumor DNA analysis detects minimal residual disease and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  A. Heger,et al.  UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy , 2016, bioRxiv.

[21]  Lincoln D. Stein,et al.  Simple, multiplexed, PCR-based barcoding of DNA enables sensitive mutation detection in liquid biopsies using sequencing , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Multifocal clonal evolution characterized using circulating tumour DNA in a case of metastatic breast cancer , 2015, Nature Communications.

[23]  Jorge S. Reis-Filho,et al.  Mutation tracking in circulating tumor DNA predicts relapse in early breast cancer , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[24]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Clonal status of actionable driver events and the timing of mutational processes in cancer evolution , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[25]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Sequenza: allele-specific copy number and mutation profiles from tumor sequencing data , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  K. Goodman,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[27]  A. Bouchard-Côté,et al.  PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer , 2014, Nature Methods.

[28]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[29]  Mauricio O. Carneiro,et al.  From FastQ Data to High‐Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline , 2013, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[30]  J. Carpten,et al.  Identification of somatic mutations in cancer through Bayesian-based analysis of sequenced genome pairs , 2013 .

[31]  Yiliang Ding,et al.  A hybridization-based approach for quantitative and low-bias single-stranded DNA ligation. , 2013, Analytical biochemistry.

[32]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Heng Li Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.

[34]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  P. Fasching,et al.  Meta-analysis Results from the Collaborative Trials in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer (CTNeoBC) , 2012 .

[36]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing , 2012, 1207.3907.

[37]  Torunn I Yock,et al.  Ultrasensitive measurement of hotspot mutations in tumor DNA in blood using error-suppressed multiplexed deep sequencing. , 2012, Cancer research.

[38]  B. Faircloth,et al.  Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Noninvasive Identification and Monitoring of Cancer Mutations by Targeted Deep Sequencing of Plasma DNA , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[40]  Wendy S. W. Wong,et al.  Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs , 2012, Bioinform..

[41]  Jacob D. Jaffe,et al.  Abstract 1: Oncogenic extracellular domain mutations of ERBB2 in cancer , 2012 .

[42]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  M. Frith,et al.  Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. , 2011, Genome research.

[44]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Accuracy of MRI in prediction of pathologic complete remission in breast cancer after preoperative therapy: a meta-analysis. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  S. Singletary,et al.  Accuracy of Physical Examination, Ultrasonography, and Mammography in Predicting Residual Pathologic Tumor Size in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2006, Annals of surgery.