Spatial optimization of watershed management practices for nitrogen load reduction using a modeling-optimization framework.

Best management practices (BMPs) can be used effectively to reduce nutrient loads transported from non-point sources to receiving water bodies. However, methodologies of BMP selection and placement in a cost-effective way are needed to assist watershed management planners and stakeholders. We developed a novel modeling-optimization framework that can be used to find cost-effective solutions of BMP placement to attain nutrient load reduction targets. This was accomplished by integrating a GIS-based BMP siting method, a WQM-TMDL-N modeling approach to estimate total nitrogen (TN) loading, and a multi-objective optimization algorithm. Wetland restoration and buffer strip implementation were the two BMP categories used to explore the performance of this framework, both differing greatly in complexity of spatial analysis for site identification. Minimizing TN load and BMP cost were the two objective functions for the optimization process. The performance of this framework was demonstrated in the Tippecanoe River watershed, Indiana, USA. Optimized scenario-based load reduction indicated that the wetland subset selected by the minimum scenario had the greatest N removal efficiency. Buffer strips were more effective for load removal than wetlands. The optimized solutions provided a range of trade-offs between the two objective functions for both BMPs. This framework can be expanded conveniently to a regional scale because the NHDPlus catchment serves as its spatial computational unit. The present study demonstrated the potential of this framework to find cost-effective solutions to meet a water quality target, such as a 20% TN load reduction, under different conditions.

[1]  D. Andow,et al.  Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States , 2005 .

[2]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Restoration of wetlands in the Mississippi–Ohio–Missouri (MOM) River Basin: Experience and needed research , 2006 .

[3]  M. Arabi,et al.  Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm , 2006 .

[4]  Guoxiang Yang,et al.  A screening-level modeling approach to estimate nitrogen loading and standard exceedance risk, with application to the Tippecanoe River watershed, Indiana. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  C. Fonseca,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHMS FOR MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION: FORMULATION, DISCUSSION, AND GENERALIZATION , 1993 .

[6]  S. Jordan,et al.  Wetlands as Sinks for Reactive Nitrogen at Continental and Global Scales: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Ecosystems.

[7]  P. Mayer,et al.  Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[8]  J. van der Ploeg,et al.  Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Selection and placement of best management practices used to reduce water quality degradation in Lincoln Lake watershed , 2011 .

[10]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[11]  Meghna Babbar-Sebens,et al.  Spatial identification and optimization of upland wetlands in agricultural watersheds , 2013 .

[12]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's , 1990 .

[13]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[14]  J. Newbold,et al.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds , 1997, Environmental management.

[15]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[16]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.

[17]  John Riverson,et al.  A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Margaret J. Eppstein,et al.  Minimization of cost, sediment load, and sensitivity to climate change in a watershed management application , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[20]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  On the scaling behavior of reliability–resilience–vulnerability indices in agricultural watersheds , 2014 .

[21]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control , 2009 .

[22]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization in Watershed Water Quality Management , 2003, EMO.

[23]  J. Hamlett,et al.  Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  D. Q. Kellogg,et al.  Ecological Engineering Practices for the Reduction of Excess Nitrogen in Human-Influenced Landscapes: A Guide for Watershed Managers , 2013, Environmental Management.

[25]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  FARM-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION OF BMP PLACEMENT FOR COST-EFFECTIVE POLLUTION REDUCTION , 2004 .