The influence of dynamic chamber design and operating parameters on calculated surface-to-air mercury fluxes

Abstract Dynamic Flux Chambers (DFCs) are commonly applied for the measurement of non-point source mercury (Hg) emissions from a wide range of surfaces. A standard operating protocol and design for DFCs does not exist, and as a result there is a large diversity in methods described in the literature. Because natural and anthropogenic non-point sources are thought to contribute significantly to the atmosphere Hg pool, development of accurate fluxes during field campaigns is essential. The objective of this research was to determine how differences in chamber material, sample port placement, vertical cross sectional area/volume, and flushing flow rate influence the Hg flux from geologic materials. Hg fluxes measured with a Teflon chamber were higher than those obtained using a polycarbonate chamber, with differences related to light transmission and substrate type. Differences in sample port placement (side versus top) did not have an influence on Hg fluxes. When the same flushing flow rate was applied to two chambers of different volumes, higher fluxes were calculated for the chamber with the smaller volume. Conversely, when two chambers with different volumes were maintained at similar turnover times, the larger volume chamber yielded higher Hg fluxes. Overall, the flushing flow rate and associated chamber turnover time had the largest influence on Hg flux relative to the other parameters tested. Results from computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling inside a DFC confirm that the smaller diffusion resistance at higher flushing flows contributes to the higher measured flux. These results clearly illustrate that differences in chamber design and operation can significantly influence the resulting calculated Hg flux, and thus impact the comparability of results obtained using DFC designs and/or operating parameters. A protocol for determining a flushing flow rate that results in fluxes less affected by chamber operating conditions and design is proposed. Application of this protocol would provide a framework for comparison of data from different studies.

[1]  P. Ariya,et al.  The influence of ozone on atmospheric emissions of gaseous elemental mercury and reactive gaseous mercury from substrates , 2005 .

[2]  I. Folkins,et al.  Mercury Flux Measurements over Air and Water in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia , 2000 .

[3]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. Part I: Air/surface exchange of mercury within a southeastern deciduous forest (Tennessee) over one year , 2008 .

[4]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Mysterious diel cycles of mercury emission from soils held in the dark at constant temperature , 2008 .

[5]  Anthony Carpi,et al.  Application of a teflon™ dynamic flux chamber for quantifying soil mercury flux: Tests and results over background soil , 1998 .

[6]  O. Lindqvist,et al.  Mercury pollution in a mining area of Guizhou, China: Fluxes over contaminated surfaces and concentrations in air, biological and geological samples , 1998 .

[7]  L. Poissant,et al.  Water-air and soil-air exchange rate of total gaseous mercury measured at background sites , 1998 .

[8]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Mercury Air/Surface Exchange Kinetics of Background Soils of the Tahquamenon River Watershed in the Michigan Upper Peninsula , 2001 .

[9]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Mercury emission to atmosphere from Lanmuchang Hg-Tl mining area, Southwestern Guizhou, China , 2005 .

[10]  A. Fostier,et al.  Influence of deforestation on the mercury air/soil exchange in the Negro River Basin‚ Amazon , 2005 .

[11]  R. Ebinghaus,et al.  Nevada STORMS project: Measurement of mercury emissions from naturally enriched surfaces , 1999 .

[12]  Jennifer L. Wollenberg,et al.  Mercury emission from a temperate lake during autumn turnover. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  X. Lee,et al.  Emission and long-range transport of gaseous mercury from a large-scale Canadian boreal forest fire. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  T. Meyers,et al.  Micrometeorological measurements of mercury vapor fluxes over background forest soils in eastern Tennessee , 1995 .

[15]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils: Part 2—effect of flushing flow rate and verification of a two-resistance exchange interface simulation model , 2002 .

[16]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the potential for re-emission of atmospherically derived Hg from soils. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Air-surface exchange of gaseous mercury over a mixed sawgrass-cattail stand within the Florida Everglades. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Gustin.  Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  M. Barnett,et al.  Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model , 2002 .

[21]  B. Mazzolai,et al.  A dynamic flux chamber to measure mercury emission from aquatic systems. , 1998, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  A. Gillis,et al.  Some potential errors in the measurement of mercury gas exchange at the soil surface using a dynamic flux chamber. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  W. Eugster,et al.  Elemental mercury fluxes over a sub-alpine grassland determined with two micrometeorological methods , 2008 .

[24]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Sunlight-Mediated Emission of Elemental Mercury from Soil Amended with Municipal Sewage Sludge , 1997 .

[25]  M. Engle,et al.  Quantifying natural source mercury emissions from the Ivanhoe Mining District, north-central Nevada, USA , 2001 .

[26]  H. Biester,et al.  Investigation of the light-enhanced emission of mercury from naturally enriched substrates , 2002 .

[27]  P. Weisberg,et al.  Air-soil exchange of mercury from background soils in the United States. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  M. Gustin,et al.  Air-Surface Exchange of Mercury with Soils Amended with Ash Materials , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[29]  M. Gustin,et al.  Effect of Watering and Soil Moisture on Mercury Emissions from Soils , 2005 .

[30]  A. Frei,et al.  Analytical artifacts produced by a polycarbonate chamber compared to a Teflon chamber for measuring surface mercury fluxes , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[31]  B. Branfireun,et al.  Gaseous mercury emissions from urban surfaces: Controls and spatiotemporal trends , 2008 .

[32]  R. Ebinghaus,et al.  Factors affecting the measurement of mercury emissions from soils with flux chambers , 1999 .

[33]  M. Engle,et al.  Mercury exchange between the atmosphere and low mercury containing substrates , 2006 .

[34]  M. Engle,et al.  Atmospheric mercury emissions from substrates and fumaroles associated with three hydrothermal systems in the western United States , 2006 .

[35]  O. Lindqvist,et al.  Cycling of mercury between water, air, and soil compartments of the environment , 1989 .

[36]  M. Gustin,et al.  Mercury Emissions from Background and Altered Geologic Units Throughout Nevada , 2004 .

[37]  M. Gustin,et al.  Evaluation of use of EcoCELL technology for quantifying total gaseous mercury fluxes over background substrates , 2007 .

[38]  D. Williamson,et al.  Some insight into the influence of urban ground surface properties on the air-surface exchange of total gaseous mercury , 2008 .

[39]  K. Ladwig,et al.  Air-Substrate Mercury Exchange Associated with Landfill Disposal of Coal Combustion Products , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.