A practical approach to cellular communications standards education

The cellular communications industry is steadily growing and expanding to solve the needs of governments, businesses and communities. Standards are fundamental to enable cooperation while promoting competition. The companies involved contribute and agree on appropriate technical specifications to ensure diversity, compatibility and facilitate worldwide commercial deployment and evolution. The specifications of cellular communications standards are extensive, complex and intentionally incomplete to spur innovation and differentiation. This makes standards education a difficult endeavor, but it is highly demanded by the wireless industry. This paper describes a practical approach to teaching cellular communications standards. Our methodology leverages software-defined radio technology and uses the abstraction layer and operating environment (ALOE) to provide a practical learning environment that facilitates developing many of the needed technical and soft skills without the inherent difficulty and cost associated with radio frequency components and regulation. We define six learning stages that assimilate the standardization process and identify key learning objectives for each. We discuss our experiences when employing the proposed methodology at Barcelona Tech in Spain, compare the approach with an equivalent class at Virginia Tech in the US and make the following observations: (1) The complexity of standards need to be abstracted and presented in a form suitable for a given class. (2) Educating about cellular communications standards is most effective when students are immersed in the process. (3) Hands-on activities need careful preparation and close guidance.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  Enhancing the Robustness of LTE Systems: Analysis and Evolution of the Cell Selection Process , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  Reflections on Teaching and Learning in an Advanced Undergraduate Course in Embedded Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[3]  Junbo Wang,et al.  A Spiral Step-by-Step Educational Method for Cultivating Competent Embedded System Engineers to Meet Industry Demands , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[4]  Vuk Marojevic,et al.  Aloe: An open-source SDR execution environment with cognitive computing resource management capabilities , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[6]  Svante Gunnarsson,et al.  Use of CDIO Standards in Swedish National Evaluation of Engineering Education Programs , 2005 .

[7]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  Extending LTE into the Unlicensed Spectrum: Technical Analysis of the Proposed Variants , 2017, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.

[8]  Antoni Gelonch,et al.  Performance and overhead analysis of the ALOE middleware for SDR , 2010, 2010 - MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE.

[9]  P. Michaud,et al.  A multidisciplinary student-centered laboratory , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[10]  Zeljko Zilic,et al.  A Laboratory Setup and Teaching Methodology for Wireless and Mobile Embedded Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[11]  John W. Thomas,et al.  A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON PROJECT-BASED LEARNING , 2000 .

[12]  Mark Turner,et al.  The software communications architecture: two decades of software radio technology innovation , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Gabriel Montoro López,et al.  SDR IN UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2010 .

[14]  Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny,et al.  Software-defined radio: a new paradigm for integrated curriculum delivery , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  COMPARING TWO APPROACHES FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT: PBL AND CDIO , 2012 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .