A prospective national survey of management and clinical outcome of acute myocardial infarction in Israel, 2000.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Manfred S. Green | Avi Porath | Jonathan Leor | Ehud Grossman | J. Leor | S. Behar | Y. Hasin | A. Battler | M. Mittelman | A. Porath | Z. Feigenberg | E. Grossman | Moshe Mittelman | Alexander Battler | Solomon Behar | B. Rabinowitz | Yonathan Hasin | Zvi Feigenberg | Carmit Rahima-Maoz | Manfred Green | Avraham Caspi | Babeth Rabinowitz | Moshe Garty | A. Caspi | M. Garty | C. Rahimamaoz
[1] P. Armstrong,et al. Fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: current status and new horizons for pharmacological reperfusion, part 1. , 2001, Circulation.
[2] Á. Avezum,et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2002, The Lancet.
[3] R. Gibbons,et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review , 1997 .
[4] M Rosén,et al. A national record linkage to study acute myocardial infarction incidence and case fatality in Sweden. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.
[5] J S Alpert,et al. Are data from clinical registries of any value? , 2000, European heart journal.
[6] M L Simoons,et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). , 2002, European heart journal.
[7] R. Califf,et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] N. Powe,et al. Lack of benefit for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with myocardial infarction who are older than 75 years. , 2000, Circulation.
[9] W. French. Trends in acute myocardial infarction management: use of the National Registry ofMyocardial Infarction in quality improvement. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.
[10] U Keil,et al. The ENACT study: a pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European Network for Acute Coronary Treatment. , 2000, European heart journal.
[11] J. Ferrières,et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in intensive care units in 1995: a nationwide French survey of practice and early hospital results. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] P. Armstrong,et al. Fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: current status and new horizons for pharmacological reperfusion, part 2. , 2001, Circulation.
[13] J O'Keefe,et al. A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .
[14] J. Wardrope,et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.
[15] T. Bowker,et al. Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK) , 2000, European heart journal.
[16] R. M. Rubison,et al. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. , 1994, Circulation.
[17] J. Tcheng. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction , 2002 .