ERPs contributing to classification in the ”P300” BCI

Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) provide a non-muscular communication channel for people with severe motor impairment. The most commonly used BCI for communication is the so called P300-Speller that received its name from the event-related potential (ERP) P300 which is elicited by the speller (oddball) paradigm. Several researchers reported that it is not only the P300 but also other ERPs that are classified with this type of BCI. This study thus, aims at contributing to the discussion by assessing the ERPs which contribute most to classification in a large sample size of N=51 participants. Our results indicate that almost 30% of all participants reached highest determination coefficients with the N200, not with the P300. Furthermore it is often a combination of both potentials that is picked up for classification. Therefore the ”P300”-BCI is truely a BCI that is controlled by various ERPs, especially the N200 and P300.

[1]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[2]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[3]  B.Z. Allison,et al.  ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Brendan Z Allison,et al.  Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance, and preference: implications for a BCI system. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  L. R. Quitadamo,et al.  Which Physiological Components are More Suitable for Visual ERP Based Brain–Computer Interface? A Preliminary MEG/EEG Study , 2010, Brain Topography.

[6]  B. Blankertz,et al.  (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[7]  Tao Liu,et al.  N200-speller using motion-onset visual response , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Out of the frying pan into the fire--the P300-based BCI faces real-world challenges. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[9]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  Rapid Communication with a “P300” Matrix Speller Using Electrocorticographic Signals (ECoG) , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[11]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.