Simulation study of SCR catalysts with individually adjusted ammonia dosing strategies

Abstract In today’s vehicle applications, SCR ammonia dosing is completed using complex control algorithms that need to be parameterized for the individual catalyst technology. Owing to the complexity of the parameterization procedures, ammonia dosing is frequently completed using either oversimplified dosing strategies (e.g., constant NH 3 /NO x ratio) or strategies previously optimized for different catalysts during the early design phase’s simulation and laboratory studies. This paper presents a practical, model-based approach that allows for simulation and laboratory studies to be performed with an individually adapted dosing profile. The procedure is based on conventional feedback control strategies, where the average ammonia storage level is controlled using a temperature dependent setpoint (the desired storage level), which is interpolated from a look-up table. The approach of this paper is to optimize numerically the entries of this look-up table for a given test cycle such that the NO x conversion is maximized while the ammonia slip is kept below a defined level. Although the optimization is performed for a particular cycle, it is demonstrated that the dosing strategies obtained in this way also work reasonably well for other test cycles. The proposed procedure was applied in a catalyst screening simulation study that compared the performance of an Fe– and a Cu–zeolite catalyst for a given test cycle. It was demonstrated that each of the two catalysts appeared to have a better performance than the other catalyst when the specified catalyst’s optimized dosing profile was applied to both catalysts. The best catalyst was only identified when comparing both catalysts using their own respective optimized dosing profile. A second simulation study used the proposed dosing procedure to compare catalysts with different ammonia storage capacities. Again, the relative ranking of the catalysts’ performance was shown to depend on the dosing profile. Overall it is demonstrated that the true potential of a catalyst can only be determined when an individually adapted dosing strategy is used.

[1]  D. Morrey,et al.  Automotive test drive cycles for emission measurement and real-world emission levels-a review , 2002 .

[2]  Amir H. Shamekhi,et al.  Development of a neural network model for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalytic converter and ammonia dosing optimization using multi objective genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[3]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Identification of urea decomposition from an SCR perspective; A combination of experimental work and molecular modeling , 2013 .

[4]  Fpt Frank Willems,et al.  Is Closed-Loop SCR Control Required to Meet Future Emission Targets? , 2007 .

[5]  Weiss Martin,et al.  A complementary emissions test for light-duty vehicles: Assessing the technical feasibility of candidate procedures , 2013 .

[6]  J. Giddings,et al.  NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF BINARY GAS-PHASE DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS , 1966 .

[7]  J. Gieshoff,et al.  NH3-SCR on Fe zeolite catalysts – From model setup to NH3 dosing , 2009 .

[8]  T. Schildhauer,et al.  Catalytic urea hydrolysis in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx: catalyst screening and kinetics on anatase TiO2 and ZrO2 , 2013 .

[9]  E. Tronconi,et al.  NO/NO2/N2O–NH3 SCR reactions over a commercial Fe-zeolite catalyst for diesel exhaust aftertreatment: Intrinsic kinetics and monolith converter modelling , 2012 .

[10]  M. Elsener,et al.  Urea-SCR: a promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines , 2000 .

[11]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Modeling the simultaneous oxidation of CO and H2 on Pt – Promoting effect of H2 on the CO-light-off , 2011 .

[12]  Michel Weibel,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Zeolite- and V-Based SCR-Catalytic Converters , 2007 .

[13]  M. S. Hegde,et al.  Catalysis for NOx abatement , 2009 .

[14]  Bernd Krutzsch,et al.  Modelling of a combined NOx storage and NH3-SCR catalytic system for Diesel exhaust gas aftertreatment , 2010 .

[15]  Gary C. Fulks,et al.  Monitoring, Feedback and Control of Urea SCR Dosing Systems for NOx Reduction: Utilizing an Embedded Model and Ammonia Sensing , 2008 .

[16]  Bernd Krutzsch,et al.  Current status of modeling lean exhaust gas aftertreatment catalysts , 2007 .

[17]  M. Votsmeier,et al.  Dynamic phenomena of SCR-catalysts containing Fe-exchanged zeolites – experiments and computer simulations , 2007 .

[19]  S Latham,et al.  A reference book of driving cycles for use in the measurement of road vehicle emissions , 2009 .

[20]  A. Bernhard,et al.  Harnstoffhydrolyse für die selektive katalytische Reduktion von NOx: Vergleich der Flüssig‐ und Gasphasenzersetzung , 2013 .

[21]  Pio Forzatti,et al.  Adequacy of lumped parameter models for SCR reactors with monolith structure , 1992 .

[22]  E. Tronconi,et al.  A comparative study of the NH3-SCR reactions over a Cu-zeolite and a Fe-zeolite catalyst , 2010 .

[23]  J. Gieshoff,et al.  Dual layer automotive ammonia oxidation catalysts: Experiments and computer simulation , 2012 .