Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach

Ligand docking to flexible protein molecules can be efficiently carried out through ensemble docking to multiple protein conformations, either from experimental X-ray structures or from in silico simulations. The success of ensemble docking often requires the careful selection of complementary protein conformations, through docking and scoring of known co-crystallized ligands. False positives, in which a ligand in a wrong pose achieves a better docking score than that of native pose, arise as additional protein conformations are added. In the current study, we developed a new ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking method and composite scoring function which combine the use of ligand-based atomic property field (APF) method with receptor structure-based docking. This method helps us to correctly dock 30 out of 36 ligands presented by the D3R docking challenge. For the six mis-docked ligands, the cognate receptor structures prove to be too different from the 40 available experimental Pocketome conformations used for docking and could be identified only by receptor sampling beyond experimentally explored conformational subspace.

[1]  William J. Allen,et al.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Paul Labute,et al.  Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[3]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Atomic Property Fields: Generalized 3D Pharmacophoric Potential for Automated Ligand Superposition, Pharmacophore Elucidation and 3D QSAR , 2007, Chemical biology & drug design.

[5]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Development of a new physics‐based internal coordinate mechanics force field and its application to protein loop modeling , 2011, Proteins.

[6]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Protein Data Bank (PDB): The Single Global Macromolecular Structure Archive. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ALiBERO: Evolving a Team of Complementary Pocket Conformations Rather than a Single Leader , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[10]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICFF: A new method to incorporate implicit flexibility into an internal coordinate force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Docking to multiple pockets or ligand fields for screening, activity prediction and scaffold hopping. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Spatial chemical distance based on atomic property fields , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  Yongbo Hu,et al.  Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  Ajay N. Jain Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Pocketome: an encyclopedia of small-molecule binding sites in 4D , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Dan Li,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[22]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[24]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Systematic Exploitation of Multiple Receptor Conformations for Virtual Ligand Screening , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Preparation and refinement of model protein-ligand complexes. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  Xavier Barril,et al.  rDock: A Fast, Versatile and Open Source Program for Docking Ligands to Proteins and Nucleic Acids , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Structure-Based Predictions of Activity Cliffs , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  C. Venkatachalam,et al.  LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[31]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  Yoshifumi Fukunishi,et al.  Miscellaneous Topics in Computer-Aided Drug Design: Synthetic Accessibility and GPU Computing, and Other Topics , 2016, Current pharmaceutical design.

[33]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE) , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[34]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[35]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  From Homology Models to a Set of Predictive Binding Pockets-a 5-HT1A Receptor Case Study , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  R Abagyan,et al.  Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[37]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.