论文信息 - An examination of the factors that influence drivers' willingness to use hand-held mobile phones

An examination of the factors that influence drivers' willingness to use hand-held mobile phones

Hand-held mobile phone use while driving is illegal throughout Australia yet many drivers persist with this behaviour. This study aims to understand the internal, driver-related and external, situational-related factors influencing drivers’ willingness to use a hand-held mobile phone while driving. Sampling 160 university students, this study utilised the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to examine a range of belief-based constructs. Additionally, drivers’ personality traits of neuroticism and extroversion were measured with the Neuroticism Extroversion Openness-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). In relation to the external, situational-related factors, four different driving-related scenarios, which were intended to evoke differing levels of drivers’ reported stress, were devised for the study and manipulated drivers’ time urgency (low versus high) and passenger presence (alone versus with friends). In these scenarios, drivers’ willingness to use a mobile phone in general was measured. Hierarchical regression analyses across the four different driving scenarios found that, overall, the TPB components significantly accounted for drivers’ willingness to use a mobile phone above and beyond the demographic variables. Subjective norms, however, was only a significant predictor of drivers’ willingness in situations where the drivers were driving alone. Generally, neuroticism and extroversion did not significantly predict drivers’ willingness above and beyond the TPB and demographic variables. Overall, the findings broaden our understanding of the internal and external factors influencing drivers’ willingness to use a hand-held mobile phone while driving despite the illegality of this behaviour. The findings may have important practical implications in terms of better informing road safety campaigns targeting drivers’ mobile phone use which, in turn, may contribute to a reduction in the extent that mobile phone use contributes to road crashes.

[1] G. Matthews,et al. Personality correlates of driver stress , 1991 .

[2] Hart Blanton,et al. Reasoned action and social reaction: willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3] E R Braver,et al. Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[4] Katherine M. White,et al. Psychosocial factors influencing mobile phone use while driving , 2007 .

[5] D. Hennessy,et al. The Influence of Traffic Congestion, Daily Hassles, and Trait Stress Susceptibility on State Driver Stress: An Interactive Perspective , 2000 .

[6] Mark Woodward,et al. Passenger carriage and car crash injury: a comparison between younger and older drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7] Paul T. Costa,et al. The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders , 1992 .

[8] Charles Poynton,et al. Frequently Asked Questions about Color , 1997 .

[9] Christine M. Wickens,et al. State Driver Stress as a Function of Occupational Stress, Traffic Congestion, and Trait Stress Susceptibility , 2007 .

[10] Lawrence T Lam,et al. Factors associated with young drivers' car crash injury: comparisons among learner, provisional, and full licensees. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11] L. Pulkkinen,et al. Personality traits and parenting: neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience as discriminative factors , 2003 .

[12] T. Lajunen,et al. Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments , 1995 .

[13] F. J. McGuigan,et al. Stress and Tension Control 2 , 1985 .

[14] H Alm,et al. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15] D. McCarthy,et al. Person-environment transactions in youth drinking and driving. , 2008, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[16] Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al. Young driving learners' intention to use a handheld or hands-free mobile phone when driving , 2009 .

[17] James G. Phillips,et al. Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18] M. Mikulincer,et al. The multidimensional driving style inventory--scale construct and validation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19] Douglas Eadie,et al. Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. , 2004, Health education research.

[20] Ryan C. Martin,et al. Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21] J. Grimshaw,et al. Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers , 2004 .

[22] Mei-Li Lin,et al. The provisional license: nighttime and passenger restrictions--a literature review. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[23] Ryan E. Rhodes,et al. Personality and social cognitive influences on exercise behavior: adding the activity trait to the theory of planned behavior. , 2004 .

[24] Corinne Brusque,et al. Analysis of the individual factors affecting mobile phone use while driving in France: socio-demographic characteristics, car and phone use in professional and private contexts. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25] Paul T. Costa,et al. Trait explanations in personality psychology , 1995 .

[26] K. Trzesniewski,et al. A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[27] O. Ben-Ari,et al. Motivational sources of driving and their associations with reckless driving cognitions and behavior , 2008 .