Effects of movement stability and congruency on the emergence of spontaneous interpersonal coordination

The current project evaluated the relationship between the stability of intrapersonal coordination and the emergence of spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Participants were organized into pairs, and each participant was instructed to produce either an inphase or antiphase pattern of intrapersonal bimanual coordination using two hand-held pendulums, while simultaneously performing an interpersonal puzzle task. At issue was whether the emergence and stability of spontaneous interpersonal rhythmic coordination is influenced by (“Experiment 1”) the stability of the intrapersonal coordination patterns produced by co-actors and (“Experiment 2”) the congruency of the intrapersonal coordination patterns produced by co-actors. The stability of intrapersonal movement coordination did not affect the emergence of spontaneous interpersonal coordination. The degree of interpersonal coordination observed was similar when both participants in a pair produced either inphase or antiphase patterns of intrapersonal bimanual coordination. Moreover, the congruency of the intrapersonal coordination patterns only slightly affected the emergence of interpersonal coordination, with only marginally lower inphase interpersonal entrainment when participants produced incongruent patterns of intrapersonal coordination (e.g., inphase–antiphase). Interestingly, movement observation and the emergence of interpersonal coordination did not affect the stability of intrapersonal bimanual coordination. The results suggest that interlimb rhythmic bimanual coordination reflects a single intrapersonal perceptual-motor synergy and that these bimanual synergies (not individual limbs) are what become spontaneously entrained interpersonally.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Extending the HKB model of coordinated movement to oscillators with different eigenfrequencies , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics , 2008 .

[7]  M. Turvey,et al.  Coupling dynamics in interlimb coordination. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Turvey,et al.  Deterministic variability and stability in detuned bimanual rhythmic coordination. , 2001, Human movement science.

[9]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Synergies in intra- and interpersonal interlimb rhythmic coordination. , 2007, Motor control.

[10]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Frequency detuning of the phase entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[12]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination , 1997 .

[14]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Horsing Around: Spontaneous Four-Legged Coordination , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  J. Kelso,et al.  Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[18]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990 .

[19]  R. Schmidt,et al.  A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Paula Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding social motor coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.

[21]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  The detuning factor in the dynamics of interlimb rhythmic coordination , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .

[25]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[27]  J. Kelso,et al.  Action-Perception as a Pattern Formation Process , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[28]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[29]  H. Haken,et al.  A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Distinguishing the noise and attractor strength of coordinated limb movements using recurrence analysis , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[32]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.