The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment

Abstract-DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.016 Goal, Scope and Background Although both cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) have developed from engineering practice, and have the same objective of a holistic ex-ante assessment of human activities, the techniques have until recently developed in relative isolation. This has resulted in a situation where much can be gained from an integration of the strong aspects of each technique. Such integration is now being prompted by the more widespread use of both CBA and LCA on the global arena, where also the issues of social responsibility are now in focus. Increasing availability of data on both biophysical and social impacts now allow the development of a truly holistic, quantitative environmental assessment technique that integrates economic, biophysical and social impact pathways in a structured and consistent way. The concept of impact pathways, linking biophysical and economic inventory results via midpoint impact indicators to final damage indicators, is well described in the LCA and CBA literature. Therefore, this paper places specific emphasis on how social aspects can be integrated in LCA. Methodsand Results. With a starting point in the conceptual structure and approach of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), as developed by Helias Udo de Haes and the SETAC/UNEP Life Cycle Initiative, the paper identifies six damage categories under the general heading of human life and well-being. The paper proposes a comprehensive set of indicators, with units of measurement, and a first estimate of global normalisation values, based on incidence or prevalence data from statistical sources and severity scores from health state analogues. Examples are provided of impact chains linking social inventory indicators to impacts on both human well-being and productivity. Recommendation and Perspective It is suggested that human well-being measured in QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) may provide an attractive single-score alternative to direct monetarisation.

[1]  J. Siegrist.  Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[2]  Stephen S. Golub,et al.  International Productivity Differences, Infrastructure, and Comparative Advantage , 2007 .

[3]  B. Weidema.  Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[4]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[5]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[6]  D. Feeny.  Health-status classification systems for summary measures of population health , 2003 .

[7]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[8]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[9]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[10]  Eric A. Posner,et al.  Introduction to Cost–Benefit Analysis , 2018, Cost-Benefit Analysis.

[11]  Johannes Siegrist,et al.  Social Productivity and Well-being of Older People: A Sociological Exploration , 2004 .

[12]  David Kucera,et al.  Measuring Trade Union Rights: A Country-Level Indicator Constructed from Coding Violations Recorded in Textual Sources , 2004 .

[13]  Edward Lee,et al.  Freedom of the Press 2.0 , 2007 .

[14]  Ruut Veenhoven,et al.  Happy life-expectancy , 1996 .

[15]  Banco Mundial,et al.  Global economic prospects and the developing countries , 1992 .

[16]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[17]  R. Gastil,et al.  Freedom in the World , 1998 .

[18]  S. Gunaratne.  Freedom of the Press , 2002 .

[19]  Johannes Siegrist,et al.  Reported nonreciprocity of social exchange and depressive symptoms. Extending the model of effort-reward imbalance beyond work. , 2003, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[20]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Conceptualizing Social Change Processes and Social Impacts , 2003 .

[21]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[22]  E. Krug,et al.  The world report on violence and health , 2002, The Lancet.

[23]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[24]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[25]  Paul Kind,et al.  A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey , 1995 .

[26]  Susheela Singh,et al.  Assessing costs and benefits of sexual and reproductive health interventions. , 2004 .

[27]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[28]  Kim Moesgaard Iburg,et al.  Summary measures of population health. An overview. , 2002, Danish medical bulletin.