Evaluation and Design of Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens

The adaptation of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to mammalian cell lines is transforming the study of human functional genomics. Pooled libraries of CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs), targeting human protein-coding genes and encoded in viral vectors, have been used to systematically create gene knockouts in a variety of human cancer and immortalized cell lines, in an effort to identify whether these knockouts cause cellular fitness defects. Previous work has shown that CRISPR screens are more sensitive and specific than pooled library shRNA screens in similar assays, but currently there exists significant variability across CRISPR library designs and experimental protocols. In this study, we re-analyze 17 genome-scale knockout screens in human cell lines from three research groups using three different genome-scale gRNA libraries, using the Bayesian Analysis of Gene Essentiality (BAGEL) algorithm to identify essential genes, to refine and expand our previously defined set of human core essential genes, from 360 to 684 genes. We use this expanded set of reference Core Essential Genes (CEG2), plus empirical data from six CRISPR knockout screens, to guide the design of a sequence-optimized gRNA library, the Toronto KnockOut version 3.0 (TKOv3) library. We demonstrate the high effectiveness of the library relative to reference sets of essential and nonessential genes as well as other screens using similar approaches. The optimized TKOv3 library, combined with the CEG2 reference set, provide an efficient, highly optimized platform for performing and assessing gene knockout screens in human cell lines.

[1]  W. Kaelin,et al.  Use and Abuse of RNAi to Study Mammalian Gene Function , 2012, Science.

[2]  E. Lander,et al.  Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome , 2015, Science.

[3]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  A CRISPR Dropout Screen Identifies Genetic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Targets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia , 2016, Cell reports.

[4]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal a Wnt–FZD5 signaling circuit as a druggable vulnerability of RNF43-mutant pancreatic tumors , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[5]  T. Takumi,et al.  Sequence features associated with the cleavage efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-Database: web-based genome-wide guide RNA library design for gene knockout screens using CRISPR-Cas9 , 2016, Bioinform..

[7]  G. Traver Hart,et al.  BAGEL: a computational framework for identifying essential genes from pooled library screens , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Chun Jimmie Ye,et al.  A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks , 2015, Cell.

[9]  J. Kent,et al.  Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR , 2016, Genome Biology.

[10]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[11]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Gene Essentiality Profiling Reveals Gene Networks and Synthetic Lethal Interactions with Oncogenic Ras , 2017, Cell.

[12]  G. Superti-Furga,et al.  Gene essentiality and synthetic lethality in haploid human cells , 2015, Science.

[13]  Nir Hacohen,et al.  Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens , 2006, Nature Methods.

[14]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Meagan E. Sullender,et al.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  M. Boutros,et al.  E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification , 2014, Nature Methods.

[17]  R. Bernards,et al.  CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  D. Durocher,et al.  High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities , 2015, Cell.

[19]  J. Moffat,et al.  Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics , 2014, bioRxiv.

[20]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[21]  T. Golub,et al.  Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[22]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells , 2014, Science.

[23]  Yilong Li,et al.  Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Jan Winter,et al.  CRISPR library designer (CLD): software for multispecies design of single guide RNA libraries , 2016, Genome Biology.