The Power in Your Hand: Gender Differences in Bodily Feedback From Making a Fist

Men and women differ in the meaning they attribute to physical coercion and bodily force. Men associate bodily force with gaining power, whereas women associate bodily force with expressing loss of power. It is hypothesized that because of these associations, performing bodily forceful behavior feeds back on appraisals of one’s power and that bodily feedback effects will mirror the gender differences in associations. Supporting these hypotheses, it was found that unobtrusively inducing behavior related to bodily force (making a fist) activated the concept of power in a Stroop task for both genders but that it increased hope for power and positive judgments of an assertively acting target for men, whereas it decreased hope for power and led to negative judgments of an assertively acting target for women.

[1]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect and cognition: The hard interface. , 1985 .

[3]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. , 1996, Child development.

[4]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[5]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[6]  F. Strack,et al.  "Mood contagion": the automatic transfer of mood between persons. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior: Basic Concepts and Issues , 1985 .

[8]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  F. Strack,et al.  Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  F. Strack,et al.  Proprioceptive Determinants of Emotional and Nonemotional Feelings , 1993 .

[12]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[13]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[14]  M. Argyle.  Bodily communication, 2nd ed. , 1988 .

[15]  R. Felson.  Violence & Gender Reexamined , 2002 .

[16]  J. Förster,et al.  The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  F. Strack,et al.  Furrowing the Brow May Undermine Perceived Fame: The Role of Facial Feedback in Judgments of Celebrity , 2000 .

[18]  T. Mussweiler,et al.  The sex-->aggression link: a perception-behavior dissociation. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  K Sokolowski,et al.  Assessing Achievement, Affiliation, and Power Motives All at Once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG) , 2000, Journal of personality assessment.

[20]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Campbell,et al.  Sex differences in aggression: social representation and social roles. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[22]  C. Anderson,et al.  Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: a meta-analysis. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  D. Bugental,et al.  The Paradoxical Misuse of Power by Those Who See Themselves as Powerless: How Does It Happen? , 1999 .

[26]  F. Strack,et al.  Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: a case of conceptual-motor compatibility. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  J. Rodin,et al.  Control and Efficacy as Interdisciplinary Bridges , 1999 .

[28]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  F. Strack,et al.  Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation , 2003 .

[30]  B. Woike,et al.  The influence of implicit motives on memory processes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[32]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  R. Klatzky.  The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments , 1989 .

[34]  A. Campbell,et al.  Comments on 'Sex differences in beliefs about aggression: opponent's sex and the form of aggression' by J. Archer and A. Haigh. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[35]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  J. Laird.  Self-attribution of emotion: the effects of expressive behavior on the quality of emotional experience. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. Förster,et al.  Compatibility between approach/ avoidance stimulation and valenced information determines residual attention during the process of encoding , 2000 .

[38]  M. Bornewasser,et al.  The judgement of behaviour as aggressive and sanctionable , 1984 .

[39]  E. Zurbriggen,et al.  Linking Motives and Emotions: A Test of McClelland's Hypotheses , 2002 .

[40]  Sharon R. Gitin.  A Dimensional Analysis of Manual Expression. , 1970 .

[41]  Roland Neumann,et al.  Approach and avoidance: the influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. , 2000 .

[42]  Richard B. Felson,et al.  Violence, aggression & coercive actions , 1994 .

[43]  B. Woike,et al.  Most-memorable experiences: evidence for a link between implicit and explicit motives and social cognitive processes in everyday life , 1995 .

[44]  F. Strack,et al.  Experiential and non-experiential routes of motor influences on affect and evaluation , 2004 .

[45]  K. Dodge,et al.  The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. , 1993, Child development.

[46]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[47]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Facial efference and the experience of emotion. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  O. C. Schultheiss,et al.  Goal imagery: Bridging the gap between implicit motives and explicit goals. , 1999 .

[49]  C. Darwin,et al.  The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , 1872 .

[50]  E. Coyle,et al.  Social representation of aggression as an explanation of gender differences: A preliminary study , 1992 .

[51]  D. Barash.  Human Ethology , 1973 .

[52]  F. Strack,et al.  Approach and avoidance: the influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Shelley Masion Rosenberg.  Bodily Communication , 1978 .

[54]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[55]  D. Mcclelland.  Power: The Inner Experience , 1975 .