SAR data collection and processing requirements for high quality coherent change detection

Coherent Change Detection (CCD) is a technique for observing very subtle changes between two Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. It is an Interferometric processing technique that measures the coherence between two images, and denotes 'change' where coherence is not observed, and 'no change' where coherence is observed. Consequently, the strategy must be to form both images with as much initial coherence as possible, and then see where in spite of our best efforts coherence cannot be achieved. Many things contribute to destroying coherence, but we want to eliminate all sources except for temporal change in the scene being imaged itself. This requires that a number of variables in the data collection be well controlled, and that the processing must be adapted to mitigate the effects of residual imperfections to achieve maximum coherence. It must be emphasized that the coherence calculation, that is, calculating the actual CCD product from two images is the easy part. The hard part is making sure that the two input images have the underlying characteristics to yield a quality result. The purpose of this paper is to discuss "What it takes to get good CCD results."

[1]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Handbook of radar scattering statistics for terrain , 1989 .

[2]  H. Ward Radar reflectivity of land and sea , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  M. Preiss,et al.  Coherent Change Detection: Theoretical Description and Experimental Results , 2006 .

[4]  David A. Yocky,et al.  The effect of scattering from buildings on interferometric SAR measurements , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[5]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Spotlight SAR interferometry for terrain elevation mapping and interferometric change detection , 1996 .

[6]  F. Dickey,et al.  Degrading effects of the lower atmosphere on long-range airborne synthetic aperture radar imaging , 2007 .

[7]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[8]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[9]  Armin W. Doerry,et al.  Performance limits for Synthetic Aperture Radar. , 2001 .

[10]  Armin W. Doerry High-precision stereoscopic 3D mapping accuracy , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Terrain elevation mapping results from airborne spotlight-mode coherent cross-track SAR stereo , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Armin W. Doerry,et al.  Wavefront curvature limitations and compensation to polar format processing for synthetic aperture radar images. , 2006 .

[13]  Sandia Report,et al.  SAR Processing with Non-Linear FM Chirp Waveforms , 2006 .

[14]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  Decorrelation in interferometric radar echoes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Douglas G. Thompson Correlation and image compression for limited-bandwidth CCD. , 2005 .