Use of barcoded pyrosequencing and shared OTUs to determine sources of fecal bacteria in watersheds.

While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new library-dependent MST method that uses pyrosequencing-derived shared operational taxonomy units (OTUs) to define sources of fecal contamination in waterways. A total 56,841 pyrosequencing reads of 16S rDNA obtained from the feces of humans and animals were evaluated and used to compare fecal microbial diversity in three freshwater samples obtained from the Yeongsan river basin in Jeonnam Province, South Korea. Sites included an urbanized agricultural area (Y1) (Escherichia coli counts ≥ 1600 CFU/100 mL), an open area (Y2) with no major industrial activities (940 CFU/100 mL), and a typical agricultural area (Y3) (≥ 1600 CFU/100 mL). Data analyses indicated that the majority of bacteria in the feces of humans and domesticated animals were comprised of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes, whereas the majority of bacteria in wild goose feces and freshwater samples were classified to the phylum Proteobacteria. Analysis of OTUs shared between the fecal and environmental samples suggested that the potential sources of the fecal contamination at the sites were of human and swine origin. Quantification of fecal contamination was also examined by comparing the density of pyrosequencing reads in each fecal sample within shared OTUs. Taken together, our results indicated that analysis of shared OTUs derived from barcoded pyrosequencing reads provide the necessary resolution and discrimination to be useful as a next generation platform for microbial source tracking studies.

[1]  J. Chun,et al.  The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencer , 2010, BMC Microbiology.

[2]  Kun Tang,et al.  Comparative analysis of human saliva microbiome diversity by barcoded pyrosequencing and cloning approaches. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Lisa R. Fogarty,et al.  Comparison of Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA Genetic Markers for Fecal Samples from Different Animal Species , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  R. Knight,et al.  Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex , 2008, Nature Methods.

[5]  Stephen B Weisberg,et al.  Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples. , 2003, Journal of water and health.

[6]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[7]  Rob Knight,et al.  UniFrac – An online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  A. Fodor,et al.  Molecular Diversity of a North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant as Revealed by Pyrosequencing , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  J. Chun,et al.  EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. , 2007, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[10]  T. Edge,et al.  Phylogenetic Diversity and Molecular Detection of Bacteria in Gull Feces , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  Anders F. Andersson,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Human Gut Microbiota by Barcoded Pyrosequencing , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  F. Bushman,et al.  Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D. Theriaque,et al.  Intestinal microbial ecology in premature infants assessed with non-culture-based techniques. , 2010, The Journal of pediatrics.

[15]  T. Whittam,et al.  Genetic diversity and population structure of Escherichia coli isolated from freshwater beaches. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[16]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Numbers of Fecal Bacteroidetes by Use of a Quantitative PCR Assay for 16S rRNA Genes , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  Daniel E. Williams,et al.  Development of Bacteroides 16S rRNA Gene TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Assays for Estimation of Total, Human, and Bovine Fecal Pollution in Water , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Joan B. Rose,et al.  Microbial Source Tracking: Current Methodology and Future Directions , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  Anne-Marie Pourcher,et al.  Evaluation of Lactobacillus sobrius/L. amylovorus as a New Microbial Marker of Pig Manure , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  D. Alland,et al.  A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.

[21]  G. Harhay,et al.  Animal-to-Animal Variation in Fecal Microbial Diversity among Beef Cattle , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  Fabrice Armougom,et al.  Monitoring Bacterial Community of Human Gut Microbiota Reveals an Increase in Lactobacillus in Obese Patients and Methanogens in Anorexic Patients , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  J. Bae,et al.  Investigation of archaeal and bacterial diversity in fermented seafood using barcoded pyrosequencing , 2010, The ISME Journal.

[24]  Fabrice Armougom,et al.  Use of pyrosequencing and DNA barcodes to monitor variations in Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes communities in the gut microbiota of obese humans , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[25]  R. Knight,et al.  Evolution of Mammals and Their Gut Microbes , 2008, Science.

[26]  S. Okabe,et al.  Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides–Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  S. Okabe,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative estimation of host-specific fecal pollution using Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers by T-RFLP and real-time PCR analyses. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  B. Roe,et al.  A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins , 2008, Nature.

[29]  S. Dowd,et al.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity among and within individual venous leg ulcers using bacterial tag-encoded FLX and Titanium amplicon pyrosequencing and metagenomic approaches , 2009, BMC Microbiology.

[30]  Fabrice Armougom,et al.  Exploring Microbial Diversity Using 16S rRNA High-Throughput Methods , 2009 .

[31]  P. Taberlet,et al.  New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[32]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  Characterization of Environmentally Persistent Escherichia coli Isolates Leached from an Irish Soil , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  S. Ishii,et al.  Presence and Growth of Naturalized Escherichia coli in Temperate Soils from Lake Superior Watersheds , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  Linda K. Dick,et al.  Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[36]  Yan Sun,et al.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) , 2008, BMC Microbiology.

[37]  J. Rothberg,et al.  The development and impact of 454 sequencing , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  James R. Knight,et al.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors , 2005, Nature.

[39]  R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[40]  Murray Wolinsky,et al.  Response to Comment by Volkov et al. on "Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil" , 2006, Science.

[41]  Mano Sivaganesan,et al.  Performance Assessment PCR-Based Assays Targeting Bacteroidales Genetic Markers of Bovine Fecal Pollution , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[42]  Martin Hartmann,et al.  Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[43]  S. Vermeire,et al.  Coamplification of Eukaryotic DNA with 16S rRNA Gene-Based PCR Primers: Possible Consequences for Population Fingerprinting of Complex Microbial Communities , 2008, Current Microbiology.

[44]  Katharine G. Field,et al.  A PCR Assay To Discriminate Human and Ruminant Feces on the Basis of Host Differences in Bacteroides-Prevotella Genes Encoding 16S rRNA , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.