Time and Sustainability Metrics in Higher Education

The purpose of this article is to highlight the importance of considering time in the assessment and measurement of sustainability. The article combines a sociological perspective on time with a qualitative assessment of the representation of time in higher education sector sustainability reporting. Data from a sample of 30 institutions in 11 countries for the period 2005–2011 on greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, and waste sent to landfill are examined. This chapter highlights the importance of considering past and future perspectives when assessing or measuring sustainability. The higher education sector has the capacity to take a longer term perspective on sustainability than the business sector as it is not subject to market and short-term pressures in the same ways. Combined with the sector’s capacity to act as agents of change, there is significant potential to influence behaviors and attitudes in business, government, and the community toward sustainability. This chapter reports on research in progress and findings should be considered preliminary. The analysis of representations of time and sustainability in higher education institutions documents is indicative and is based on a purposive sample, deliberately chosen in order to explore perspectives on time. The chapter highlights how the higher education sector is uniquely placed to influence the ways in which sustainability is assessed and measured.

[1]  M. Redclift Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age , 2005 .

[2]  S. Dresner The principles of sustainability , 2002 .

[3]  S. Morse Sustainability: A Biological Perspective , 2010 .

[4]  S. Marginson Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher education , 2008 .

[5]  John Robinson Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development , 2004 .

[6]  Akiyoshi Yonezawa Strategies for the emerging global higher education market in East Asia: a comparative study of Singapore, Malaysia and Japan , 2007 .

[7]  M. Peters,et al.  Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism , 2005 .

[8]  R. Yang Globalisation and Higher Education Development: A Critical Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Peter Harper,et al.  Australia's environment : issues and trends, 2006 , 2006 .

[10]  Parikhit Sinha,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Institutions of Higher Education , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  N. Stern What is the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[12]  D. Chan Global agenda, local responses: changing education governance in Hong Kong’s higher education , 2007 .

[13]  W. Viscusi Rational Discounting for Regulatory Analysis , 2006 .

[14]  Ulrich Teichler,et al.  Massification and Diversity of Higher Education Systems: Interplay of Complex Dimensions , 2007 .

[15]  Julie Newman,et al.  Defining sustainability metric targets in an institutional setting , 2009 .

[16]  T. Graedel Quantitative sustainability in a college or university setting , 2002 .

[17]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  Sustainability at universities : opportunities, challenges and trends , 2009 .

[18]  John Handmer,et al.  Contradictions in Sustainability , 1993, Environmental Conservation.

[19]  Garnaut Climate Change Review - Update 2011 Update Paper one: Weighing the cost and benefits of climate change action , 2011 .