Quantitative learning strategies based on word networks

Abstract Learning English requires a considerable effort, but the way that vocabulary is introduced in textbooks is not optimized for learning efficiency. With the increasing population of English learners, learning process optimization will have significant impact and improvement towards English learning and teaching. The recent developments of big data analysis and complex network science provide additional opportunities to design and further investigate the strategies in English learning. In this paper, quantitative English learning strategies based on word network and word usage information are proposed. The strategies integrate the words frequency with topological structural information. By analyzing the influence of connected learned words, the learning weights for the unlearned words and dynamically updating of the network are studied and analyzed. The results suggest that quantitative strategies significantly improve learning efficiency while maintaining effectiveness. Especially, the optimized-weight-first strategy and segmented strategies outperform other strategies. The results provide opportunities for researchers and practitioners to reconsider the way of English teaching and designing vocabularies quantitatively by balancing the efficiency and learning costs based on the word network.

[1]  David Brodsky,et al.  Spanish Vocabulary: An Etymological Approach , 2008 .

[2]  Jon-Fan Hu,et al.  Advanced Learning Chinese Characters Strategy Based on the Characteristics of Component and Character Frequency , 2014, CogSci.

[3]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[4]  Xinyue Zhang,et al.  The Correlation Study on the Relationship between the Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Comprehensive Ability , 2014 .

[5]  Tommy W. S. Chow,et al.  Mining language variation using word using and collocation characteristics , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction , 1994 .

[7]  Ying Zheng,et al.  Test review: College English Test (CET) in China: , 2008 .

[8]  Guilherme Alberto Wachs-Lopes,et al.  Analyzing natural human language from the point of view of dynamic of a complex network , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Paul Meara Teaching vocabulary: Wallace, Michael, London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1982, 144 pp. (Practical Language Teaching No. 10) , 1984 .

[10]  Maria Markosova Network model of human language , 2008 .

[11]  Suping Wang An Empirical Study on the Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in EFL Listening Comprehension , 2015 .

[12]  Robert A. Fowkes,et al.  A New Etymological Dictionary of English@@@Lectures on the Science of Language; Second Series@@@Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English , 1959 .

[13]  Keith Richards,et al.  Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000 , 2009, Language Teaching.

[14]  María S. Carlo,et al.  The Critical Role of Vocabulary Development for English Language Learners , 2005 .

[15]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  Praveen Pathak,et al.  Making words work: Using financial text as a predictor of financial events , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  P. Gu Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. , 2003 .

[18]  Birgit Henriksen,et al.  Vocabulary acquisition: acquiring depth of knowledge through network building , 2000 .

[19]  Lütfiye Cengizhan,et al.  Vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Edirne Anatolian high school , 2011 .

[20]  S N Dorogovtsev,et al.  Language as an evolving word web , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Dan Tufis,et al.  Experiments with a Differential Semantics Annotation for WordNet 3.0 , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Yong Li,et al.  Small-world patterns in Chinese phrase networks , 2005 .

[23]  Paolo Prinetto,et al.  Integrating MultiWordNet with Italian Sign Language lexical resources , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Shuigeng Zhou,et al.  An empirical study of Chinese language networks , 2008 .

[25]  R. K. Johnson,et al.  Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Language Learning Outcomes , 1996 .

[26]  Anber Nacera,et al.  Languages learning strategies and the vocabulary size , 2010 .

[27]  Gilberto Corso,et al.  The network of syllables in Portuguese , 2005 .

[28]  Ulf Riebesell,et al.  Influence of Ocean Acidification on a Natural Winter-to-Summer Plankton Succession: First Insights from a Long-Term Mesocosm Study Draw Attention to Periods of Low Nutrient Concentrations , 2016, PloS one.

[29]  Victor Leathers On Teaching Vocabulary , 1947 .

[30]  P. Lewis Ethnologue : languages of the world , 2009 .

[31]  Bojan Furlan,et al.  Semantic similarity of short texts in languages with a deficient natural language processing support , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  T. F. Hoad,et al.  The Concise Oxford dictionary of English etymology , 1993 .

[33]  Jinyun Ke,et al.  Analysing Language Development from a Network Approach* , 2006, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[34]  Alexandra G. Leavell,et al.  Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context , 2006 .

[35]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Vocabulary notebooks: theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions , 1995 .

[36]  Jianyu Li,et al.  Chinese character structure analysis based on complex networks , 2007 .

[37]  Anna Uhl Chamot,et al.  ISSUES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY RESEARCH AND TEACHING , 2004 .

[38]  Shirley ShiDu Yan,et al.  Cyclophilin D Deficiency Rescues Axonal Mitochondrial Transport in Alzheimer’s Neurons , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[40]  James Coady,et al.  INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[41]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[42]  Jinzhao Wang,et al.  Optimizing the Learning Order of Chinese Characters Using a Novel Topological Sort Algorithm , 2016, PloS one.

[43]  Moslem Zolfagharkhani,et al.  The Effect of Etymology Instruction on Vocabulary Learning of Upper-Intermediate EFL Iranian Learners , 2011 .

[44]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Topology of the conceptual network of language. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  D. Watts,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2001 .

[46]  Reinhard Köhler,et al.  Patterns in syntactic dependency networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The small world of human language , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Advanced Foreign Language Students: The Influence of Marginal Glosses, Dictionary Use, and Reoccurrence of Unknown Words , 1996 .

[49]  Gang Peng,et al.  The networks of syllables and characters in Chinese* , 2008, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[50]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Ying Fan,et al.  Efficient Learning Strategy of Chinese Characters Based on Network Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[52]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Deviation of Zipf's and Heaps' Laws in Human Languages with Limited Dictionary Sizes , 2013, Scientific reports.

[53]  Paul Meara,et al.  RESEARCHING VOCABULARY THROUGH A WORD KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[54]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Networks of Phonologically Similar Words in English and Spanish , 2010, Entropy.