Random finite element method for spudcan foundations in spatially variable soils

Abstract Spudcans are large diameter (~ 20 m) conical foundations holding up mobile jack-up platforms for offshore oil and gas developments in shallow to moderate water depths. During self-installation the spudcan often penetrates several tens of meters into seabed soils, where large variations often occur in the shear strength of the soils. Although the failure mechanisms and bearing capacity of spudcan foundations have been studied in homogeneous soil and layered uniform soil, the effect of the spatial variability in soil strength on the spudcan response is still unclear. This study presents a random finite element method (RFEM) for assessing the failure mechanisms and the bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation embedded in spatially varied seabed soils. A comprehensive review of seabed soils discusses typical ranges of the mean, the coefficient of variation and the scale of fluctuation of the undrained shear strength. Random fields are generated and mapped into a non-linear finite element analysis to reveal the failure mechanisms of the spudcan in spatially varied soils. The influence of the scale of fluctuation in different directions is investigated. The results indicate that ignoring the spatial variability of soil strength leads to an overestimation of the bearing capacity. It is unconservative for the foundation design to assume an isotropic random field model in the RFEM analysis.

[1]  Yinghui Tian,et al.  Failure Mechanism and Bearing Capacity of Footings Buried at Various Depths in Spatially Random Soil , 2015 .

[2]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Determining Appropriate Stiffness Levels for Spudcan Foundations Using Jack-Up Case Records , 2002 .

[3]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: centrifuge tests , 2010 .

[4]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay , 2004 .

[5]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Slope reliability analysis considering spatially variable shear strength parameters using a non-intrusive stochastic finite element method , 2014 .

[6]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: experimental and finite-element investigation of potential punch-through failure , 2013 .

[7]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Effect of element sizes in random field finite element simulations of soil shear strength , 2013 .

[8]  Chun Fai Leung,et al.  Improved Guidelines for the Prediction of Geotechnical Performance of Spudcan Foundations During Installation and Removal of Jack-up Units , 2009 .

[9]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Simplified quantitative risk assessment of rainfall-induced landslides modelled by infinite slopes , 2014 .

[10]  M. F. Bransby,et al.  Drag anchor fluke-soil interaction in clays , 2003, Numerical Models in Geomechanics.

[11]  G. Baecher.  Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2003 .

[12]  Suzanne Lacasse,et al.  An homage to Wilson Tang: Reliability and risk in geotechnical practice—how Wilson led the way , 2013 .

[13]  G. Fenton,et al.  Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision , 1990 .

[14]  Michael A. Hicks,et al.  On the estimation of scale of fluctuation in geostatistics , 2014 .

[15]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Spatial correlation length of normalized cone data in sand: Case study in the north of Denmark , 2014 .

[16]  John P. Carter,et al.  Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading , 2000 .

[17]  David Menzies,et al.  Comparison of Jackup Rig Spudcan Penetration Methods in Clay , 2008 .

[18]  Tien H. Wu,et al.  Uncertainties in Evaluation of Strength of Marine Sand , 1987 .

[19]  Lei Wang,et al.  Robust design in geotechnical engineering – an update , 2014 .

[20]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modelling , 2001 .

[21]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[22]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: a simplified conceptual model , 2013 .

[23]  Robert B. Gilbert,et al.  Modeling spatial variability in offshore geotechnical properties for reliability-based foundation design , 2014 .

[24]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay , 2011 .

[25]  Marco Uzielli,et al.  Uncertainty-based characterization of piezocone and T-bar data for the Laminaria offshore site , 2015 .

[26]  C. Erbrich,et al.  Australian frontiers – spudcans on the edge , 2005 .

[27]  S. Lacasse,et al.  Autocorrelation Functions for Offshore Geotechnical Data , 1990 .

[28]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited , 2001 .

[29]  Alan G. Young,et al.  Foundation Performance of Offshore Jack-Up Drilling Rigs , 1984 .

[30]  Mark Randolph,et al.  New Mechanism-Based Design Approach for Spudcan Foundations on Single Layer Clay , 2009 .

[31]  Wilson H. Tang.  Probabilistic Evaluation of Penetration Resistances , 1979 .

[32]  Yinghui Tian,et al.  Probabilistic combined loading failure envelopes of a strip footing on spatially variable soil , 2013 .

[33]  Characterisation of undrained shear strength using statistical methods , 2011 .