Modeling the impact of spinal cord stimulation paddle lead position on impedance, stimulation threshold, and activation region

The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain treatment depends on selection of appropriate stimulation settings, which can be especially challenging following posture change or SCS lead migration. The objective of this work was to investigate the feasibility of using SCS lead impedance for determining the location of a SCS lead and for detecting lead migration, as well as the impact of axial movement and rotation of the St. Jude Medical PENTA™ paddle in the dorsal-ventral or medial-lateral directions on dorsal column (DC) stimulation thresholds and neural activation regions. We used a two-stage computational model, including a finite element method model of field potentials in the spinal cord during stimulation, coupled to a biophysical cable model of mammalian, myelinated nerve fibers to calculate tissue impedance and nerve fiber activation within the DC. We found that SCS lead impedance was highly sensitive to the distance between the lead and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) layer. In addition, among all the lead positions studied, medial-lateral movement resulted in the most substantial changes to SC activation regions. These results suggest that impedance can be used for detecting paddle position and lead migration, and therefore for guiding SCS programming.

[1]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Model-based analysis and design of nerve cuff electrodes for restoring bladder function by selective stimulation of the pudendal nerve , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Dominique M. Durand,et al.  MODELING OF MAMMALIAN MYELINATED NERVE FOR FUNCTIONAL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION. , 1987 .

[3]  J Holsheimer,et al.  Morphometry of human superficial dorsal and dorsolateral column fibres: significance to spinal cord stimulation. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Henderson,et al.  Failure modes of spinal cord stimulation hardware. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  S. Rosen,et al.  Increased Pain Catastrophizing Associated With Lower Pain Relief During Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results From a Large Post‐Market Study , 2015, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[6]  P. Pahapill Incidence of Revision Surgery in a Large Cohort of Patients With Thoracic Surgical Three‐Column Paddle Leads: A Retrospective Case Review , 2015, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[7]  J Holsheimer,et al.  MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: The narrow bipole and tripole , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  Jianguo Cheng,et al.  Retrospective Review of 707 Cases of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Indications and Complications , 2011, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[10]  Dongchul Lee,et al.  Predicted effects of pulse width programming in spinal cord stimulation: a mathematical modeling study , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  D. Durand,et al.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  M. Moffitt,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Engineering Approaches to Clinical and Physiological Challenges , 2009 .