Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?

The striking growth in the trade share of output is one of the most important developments in the world economy since World War II. Two features of this growth present challenges to the standard trade models. First, the growth is generally thought to have been generated by falling tariff barriers worldwide. But tariff barriers have decreased by only about 11 percentage points since the early 1960s; the standard models cannot explain the growth of trade without assuming counterfactually large elasticities of substitution between goods. Second, tariff declines were much larger prior to the mid 1980s than after, and yet, trade growth was smaller in the earlier period than in the later period. The standard models have difficulty generating this nonlinear feature. This paper develops a two-country dynamic Ricardian trade model that offers a resolution of these two puzzles. The key idea embedded in this model is vertical specialization, which occurs when countries specialize only in particular stages of a good's production sequence. The model generates a nonlinear trade response to tariff reductions and can explain over 50 percent of the growth of trade. Finally, the model has important implications for the gains from trade.

[1]  R. Feenstra U.S. Exports, 1972-1994: With State Exports and Other U.S. Data , 1997 .

[2]  Henryk Kierzkowski,et al.  Globalization and the consequences of international fragmentation , 2001 .

[3]  W. Diebold,et al.  Trade Negotiations in the Tokyo Round: A Quantitative Assessment , 1978 .

[4]  D. Davis,et al.  Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach , 1995 .

[5]  Scott L. Baier,et al.  The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity , 2001 .

[6]  J. Harrigan Cross-country comparisons of industry total factor productivity: theory and evidence , 1997 .

[7]  D. Prag The economics of the European community , 1982 .

[8]  B. Balassa Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth , 1999 .

[10]  Dana Rapoport,et al.  Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade , 1998 .

[11]  R. Findlay An "Austrian" Model of International Trade and Interest Rate Equalization , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Chang-Tai Hsieh,et al.  Classical Ricardian Theory of Comparative Advantage Revisited , 2000 .

[13]  J. Whalley Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas , 1984 .

[14]  B. Balassa Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage , 1965 .

[15]  Junzo Ishii,et al.  The growth of world trade , 1997 .

[16]  B. Balassa,et al.  Trade Liberalization among Industrial Countries , 1967 .

[17]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Technology, Geography, and Trade , 2002 .

[18]  Krugman,et al.  SCALE ECONOMIES, PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION AND THE PATTERN OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE , 1980 .

[19]  Timothy J. Kehoe,et al.  Trade theory and trade facts , 2001 .

[20]  A. El-Agraa Economics of the European Community. , 1985 .

[21]  D. Irwin The Gatt&Apos;S Contribution to Economic Recovery in Post-War Western Europe , 1994 .

[22]  R. B. Schwenger Preeg, Ernest H., Traders and Diplomats: An Analysis of the Kennedy Round of Negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1970, xv + 320 pp. ($6.75) , 1971 .

[23]  J. Francois,et al.  The Uruguay Round: A Numerically-based Qualitative Assessment”, chapter 9 in W. Martin and L.A. Winters (eds.) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries , 2001 .

[24]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Evolving patterns of international trade , 2000 .

[25]  Yingfeng Xu A GENERAL MODEL OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE WITH TWO FACTORS AND A CONTINUUM OF GOODS , 1993 .

[26]  J. Williamson,et al.  Late Nineteenth-Century Anglo-American Factor-Price Convergence: Were Heckscher and Ohlin Right? , 1994, The Journal of Economic History.

[27]  Joan Feeney International risk sharing, learning by doing, and growth , 1999 .

[28]  J. Harrigan Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model , 1996 .

[29]  D. Weil,et al.  A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth Author ( s ) : , 2008 .

[30]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  Computational Analysis of Global Trading Arrangements , 1991 .

[31]  B. Balassa 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage Revisited: An Analysis of Relative Export Shares of the Industrial Countries, 1953-1971 , 1977 .

[32]  Alan V. Deardorff,et al.  "Introduction" To Computational Analysis Of Global Trading Arrangements , 1990 .

[33]  Simon Webley Trade liberalization among major world trading areas , 1986 .

[34]  Alan V. Deardorff Fragmentation in Simple Trade Models , 1998 .

[35]  Michael A. Kouparitsas North-South business cycles , 1996 .

[36]  Mario J. Crucini,et al.  Tariffs and aggregate economic activity: Lessons from the Great Depression , 1996 .

[37]  J. Harrigan Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions , 1998 .

[38]  Charles I. Plosser,et al.  Growth and Business Cycles I. The Basic Neoclassical Model , 1988 .

[39]  A. Maddison,et al.  Dynamic forces in capitalist development , 1991 .

[40]  A. Maddison,et al.  Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View , 1991 .

[41]  Finn E. Kydland,et al.  Dynamics of the Trade Balance and the Terms of Trade: The J-Curve Revisited , 1992 .

[42]  P. Samuelson,et al.  Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods - , 1976 .

[43]  R. Feenstra U.S. Imports, 1972-1994: Data and Concordances , 1996 .

[44]  David Hummels,et al.  The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade , 1999 .

[45]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Productivity across industries and countries : time series theory and evidence , 1996 .

[46]  Charles I. Plosser,et al.  Production, growth and business cycles , 1988 .

[47]  Marianne Baxter Fiscal Policy, Specialization, and Trade in the Two-Sector Model: The Return of Ricardo? , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.