Word Generalization by a Dog (Canis familiaris): Is Shape Important?

We investigated the presence of a key feature of human word comprehension in a five year old Border Collie: the generalization of a word referring to an object to other objects of the same shape, also known as shape bias. Our first experiment confirmed a solid history of word learning in the dog, thus making it possible for certain object features to have become central in his word comprehension. Using an experimental paradigm originally employed to establish shape bias in children and human adults we taught the dog arbitrary object names (e.g. dax) for novel objects. Two experiments showed that when briefly familiarized with word-object mappings the dog did not generalize object names to object shape but to object size. A fourth experiment showed that when familiarized with a word-object mapping for a longer period of time the dog tended to generalize the word to objects with the same texture. These results show that the dog tested did not display human-like word comprehension, but word generalization and word reference development of a qualitatively different nature compared to humans. We conclude that a shape bias for word generalization in humans is due to the distinct evolutionary history of the human sensory system for object identification and that more research is necessary to confirm qualitative differences in word generalization between humans and dogs.

[1]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[2]  P. Bloom,et al.  How specific is the shape bias? , 2003, Child development.

[3]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[4]  J. Call,et al.  Word Learning in a Domestic Dog: Evidence for "Fast Mapping" , 2004, Science.

[5]  S. Waxman,et al.  Taking stock as theories of word learning take shape. , 2008, Developmental science.

[6]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Linda B Smith,et al.  They call it like they see it: spontaneous naming and attention to shape. , 2005, Developmental science.

[8]  Jessica S. Horst,et al.  Confronting complexity: insights from the details of behavior over multiple timescales. , 2008, Developmental science.

[9]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[10]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[11]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[12]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[13]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[14]  F. Keil The shape of things to come: the future of the shape bias controversy. , 2008, Developmental science.

[15]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[16]  Alliston K. Reid,et al.  Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names , 2002 .

[18]  D. Kimbrough Oller,et al.  Vocabulary Learning in a Yorkshire Terrier: Slow Mapping of Spoken Words , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  E. Markman,et al.  Word learning in dogs? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  T. Poggio,et al.  BOOK REVIEW David Marr’s Vision: floreat computational neuroscience VISION: A COMPUTATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE HUMAN REPRESENTATION AND PROCESSING OF VISUAL INFORMATION , 2009 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  C. Cotman,et al.  Chronic antioxidant and mitochondrial cofactor administration improves discrimination learning in aged but not young dogs , 2005, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  C. Ades,et al.  Two-Item Sentence Comprehension by a Dog (Canis familiaris) , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Can a Dog Learn a Word? , 2004, Science.

[25]  C. Cotman,et al.  Visual-discrimination learning ability and β-amyloid accumulation in the dog , 1998, Neurobiology of Aging.

[26]  L. Markson,et al.  The shape of thought. , 2008, Developmental science.

[27]  Paul Bloom,et al.  The shape of controversy: what counts as an explanation of development? Introduction to the special section. , 2008, Developmental science.

[28]  S. Pinker,et al.  The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.

[29]  J. Elman The shape bias: an important piece in a bigger puzzle. , 2008, Developmental science.

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[31]  Anna Maria Di Sciullo,et al.  The Biological Nature of Human Language , 2010 .

[32]  K. Dewar,et al.  Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[33]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The Self-organization of Skilled Noun Learning the Attentional Learning Account , 2022 .