Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories

Same-different reaction times (RTs) were obtained to pairs of synthetic speech sounds ranging perceptually from /ba/ through /pa/. Listeners responded “same” if both stimuli in a pair were the same phonetic segments (i.e., /ba/-/ba/ or /pa/-/pa/) or “different” if both stimuli were different phonetic segments (i.e., /ba/-/pa/ or /pa/-/ba/). RT for “same” responses was faster to pairs of acoustically identical stimuli (A-A) than to pairs of acoustically different stimuli (A-a) belonging to the same phonetic category. RT for “different” responses was faster for large acoustic differences across a phonetic boundary than for smaller acoustic differences across a phonetic boundary. The results suggest that acoustic information for stop consonants is available to listeners, although the retrieval of this information in discrimination will depend on the level of processing accessed by the particular information processing task.

[1]  G. A. Miller The Perception of Speech. , 1951 .

[2]  I. Pollack The Information of Elementary Auditory Displays , 1952 .

[3]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Current trends in linguistics. , 1959, Science.

[5]  A. Liberman,et al.  Identification and Discrimination of Rounded and Unrounded Vowels , 1963 .

[6]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Reaction Time to Synthetic Stop Consonants and Vowels at Phoneme Centers and at Phoneme Boundaries , 1963 .

[7]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[8]  M I Posner,et al.  Chronometric analysis of classification. , 1967, Psychological review.

[9]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[10]  Franklin S. Cooper,et al.  Computer‐Controlled PCM System for Investigation of Dichotic Speech Perception , 1969 .

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. , 1970, Psychological review.

[13]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Abstraction and The Process of Recognition , 1970 .

[14]  I. Pollack,et al.  On the comparison between identification and discrimination tests in speech perception , 1971 .

[15]  J. Barclay,et al.  Noncategorical perception of a voiced stop: A replication , 1972 .

[16]  D. Pisoni Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.