Configurational Information in Face Perception

A new facial composites technique is demonstrated, in which photographs of the top and bottom halves of different familiar faces fuse to form unfamiliar faces when aligned with each other. The perception of a novel configuration in such composite stimuli is sufficiently convincing to interfere with identification of the constituent parts (experiment 1), but this effect disappears when stimuli are inverted (experiment 2). Difficulty in identifying the parts of upright composites is found even for stimuli made from parts of unfamiliar faces that have only ever been encountered as face fragments (experiment 3). An equivalent effect is found for composites made from internal and external facial features of well-known people (experiment 4). These findings demonstrate the importance of configurational information in face perception, and that configurations are only properly perceived in upright faces.

[1]  F. Galton.  Composite Portraits, Made by Combining Those of Many Different Persons Into a Single Resultant Figure. , 1879 .

[2]  F. Galton.  Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development , 1883 .

[3]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[4]  K. F. Scapinello,et al.  The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli , 1970 .

[5]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  H. Ellis.  Recognizing faces. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[7]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[8]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[10]  Maryanne Martin.  Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[11]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[12]  J. R. Pomerantz.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Frans J. Maarse,et al.  Initial microgenetic steps in single-glance face recognition , 1984 .

[14]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Kinya Maruyama,et al.  Effects of observer's attitude on the familiarity of faces: Using the difference in cue value between central and peripheral facial elements as an index of familiarity. , 1985 .

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[17]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[18]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[19]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.