Understanding end-user support for health information technology: a theoretical framework.

BACKGROUND Support is often considered an important factor for successful implementation and realising the benefits of health information technology (HIT); however, there is a dearth of research on support and theoretical frameworks to characterise it. OBJECTIVE To develop and present a comprehensive, holistic, framework for characterising enduser support that can be applied to various settings and types of information systems. METHOD Scoping review of the medical informatics and information systems literature. RESULTS A theoretical framework of end-user support is presented. It includes the following facets: support source, location of support, support activities, and perceived characteristics of support and support personnel. CONCLUSION The proposed framework may be a useful tool for describing and characterising enduser support for HIT. it may also be used by decision makers and implementation leaders for planning purposes.

[1]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[2]  Steven R. Gordon Computing Information Technology: The Human Side , 2003 .

[3]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The Organizational Interface: A Method for Supporting End Users of Packaged Software , 1992, MIS Q..

[4]  William R. King,et al.  The Development of a Measure for End-User Computing Support , 1994 .

[5]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  A Social Cognitive View of Technical Support and its Influence on User Learning , 2002, ICIS.

[6]  Ann Bygholm End-user Support: A Necessary Issue in the Implementation and Use of EPR Systems , 2001, MedInfo.

[7]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Sources of dissatisfaction in end-user support: an empirical study , 2002, DATB.

[8]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Service Support Levels: An Organizational Approach to End-User Computing , 1986, MIS Q..

[9]  Lone Stub Petersen Complexities in securing sustainable IT infrastructures in Hospitals: The many faces of Local Technical Support , 2010, MedInfo.

[10]  Fritz H. Grupe,et al.  An examination of sources of support preferred by end-user computing personnel , 1993 .

[11]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[12]  Vikram Sethi,et al.  A model of end user attitudes and intentions toward alternative sources of support , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[13]  William J. Doll,et al.  The place and value of documentation in end-user computing , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Davis P. Harris People helping people: examining the relationship between the support provider and the support recipient in an IS environment , 1995 .

[15]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[16]  Juanita I. Fernando Clinicians, security and information technology support services in practice settings - A pilot study , 2010, MedInfo.

[17]  Brian J. Reithel,et al.  Beyond the information center: An instrument to measure end-user computing support from multiple sources , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Robin Munkvold,et al.  End user support usage , 2003 .

[19]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Differences in end-user computing support and control across user departments , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Susan J. Winter,et al.  Misplaced resources? Factors associated with computer literacy among end-users , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Tor Guimaraes The support and management of user computing in the 1990s , 1997 .

[22]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[23]  Maria Lluch,et al.  Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies - A literature review , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.