Use of Online Social Network Sites for Personal Purposes at Work: Does it Impair Self-Reported Performance?1

Abstract Online social network sites are often used for personal purposes during working hours. Whether or not such use interferes with and impairs work performance is obviously of organizational and economical interest. This impairment hypothesis was empirically tested by the current study. A total of 11,018 (5,656 male) employees participated in a web-based cross-sectional survey distributed in the online edition of several Norwegian newspapers. To investigate the relationship between the use of online social network sites for personal purposes during working hours and self-reported work performance, these measures were included with additional questions about demography (age, sex, education, relationship status, professional position) and personality (Mini-IPIP; Extroversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Intellect/Imagination). The data was analyzed by hierarchical regression analyses, where absolute (usual performance) and relative (usual performance compared to one's judgment of the...

[1]  Juline E. Mills,et al.  Cyberslacking! A wired-workplace liability issue , 2001 .

[2]  Murugan Anandarajan,et al.  Exploring the Underlying Structure of Personal Web Usage in the Workplace , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  Gary Johns,et al.  Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. , 2010 .

[4]  S. Folkard,et al.  Shift work, safety and productivity. , 2003, Occupational medicine.

[5]  A. Dysvik,et al.  Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance , 2014 .

[6]  Katherine M. White,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior Applied to Young People's Use of Social Networking Web Sites , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  J. Salgado.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  F. A. Pettit.  A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Vivien K. G. Lim,et al.  Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work? , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  M. Griffiths.  Internet abuse in the workplace: Issues and concerns for employers and employment counselors , 2003 .

[11]  C. S. Andreassen,et al.  Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale , 2012, Psychological reports.

[12]  W. C. Borman.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Personality and the Prediction of Job Performance: More Than the Big Five , 2004 .

[13]  Pablo Zoghbi Manrique de Lara,et al.  Internet Research , 2022 .

[14]  S. Mattke,et al.  A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. , 2007, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  Richard Turner,et al.  The dawn of a new approach to security , 2010 .

[16]  M. Rotundo.  The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  P. Terry,et al.  An examination of presenteeism measures: the association of three scoring methods with health, work life, and consumer activation. , 2010, Population health management.

[19]  Paul E. Stang,et al.  Using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) to Evaluate the Indirect Workplace Costs of Illness , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[20]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  The Interaction of Work Stressors and Organizational Sanctions on Cyberloafing , 2008 .

[21]  Carl E. Giese,et al.  Handbook of Leadership; a Survey of Theory and Research , 1974 .

[22]  Matthew S. Eastin,et al.  Psychology of Communication Technology Use in the Workplace , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Ronald C. Kessler,et al.  The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) , 2003, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[24]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  HOW BROADLY DOES EDUCATION CONTRIBUTE TO JOB PERFORMANCE , 2009 .

[25]  Heike Heidemeier,et al.  Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Ståle Pallesen,et al.  Predictors of Use of Social Network Sites at Work - A Specific Type of Cyberloafing , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Kimberly Young,et al.  Employee Internet Management: Current Business Practices and Outcomes , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Warren C. K. Chiu,et al.  Transformational leadership and job performance : a social identity perspective , 2014 .

[30]  R. Escorpizo.  Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders , 2008 .

[31]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality, learning style and work performance , 1999 .

[32]  Bård Kuvaas,et al.  Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: the roles of pay administration and pay level , 2006 .

[33]  C. S. Andreassen,et al.  Social network site addiction - an overview. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[34]  W. Block.  Cyberslacking, Business Ethics and Managerial Economics , 2011 .

[35]  S. Mehay,et al.  Marital Status and Productivity: Evidence from Personnel Data , 2005 .

[36]  Christopher P. Cerasoli,et al.  Relationships between psychological, physical, and behavioural health and work performance: A review and meta-analysis , 2011 .

[37]  Kimberly Young,et al.  Internet Abuse in the Workplace: New Trends in Risk Management , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .

[39]  M. Griffiths,et al.  The Prevalence of Workaholism: A Survey Study in a Nationally Representative Sample of Norwegian Employees , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  Emin Kahya.  The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance , 2007 .

[41]  Christine A. Henle,et al.  Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[43]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  Games at Work: The Recreational Use of Computer Games During Working Hours , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[44]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Jo Ann Oravec.  Constructive approaches to internet recreation in the workplace , 2002, CACM.

[46]  Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara,et al.  Reconsidering the boundaries of the cyberloafing activity: the case of a university , 2012 .

[47]  V. Lim.  The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice , 2002 .

[48]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  P. Bobko,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Gender Group Differences for Measures of Job Performance in Field Studies , 2012 .

[50]  K. Young.  Internet Addiction: Diagnosis and Treatment Considerations , 2009, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy.

[51]  Srikanth Beldona,et al.  Cyberslacking!: A Liability Issue for Wired Workplaces , 2001 .

[52]  R. Ozminkowski,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[53]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  E. Yano,et al.  Mental ability and psychological work performance in Chinese workers. , 2006, Industrial health.

[55]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[56]  N. Quinn,et al.  Present and unaccounted for. , 2002, Occupational health & safety.

[57]  P. Cozby,et al.  Methods in behavioral research , 1977 .

[58]  J. Kmec,et al.  We (Have to) Try Harder , 2007 .

[59]  D. Smithy.  Absenteeism and "Presenteeism" in Industry , 1970 .

[60]  T. Torsheim,et al.  Prevalence and Correlates of Problem Gambling in a Representative Sample of Norwegian 17-Year-Olds , 2014, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[61]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[62]  Brian C. Cronk,et al.  Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[63]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  D. Whitehouse.  Workplace presenteeism: How behavioral professionals can make a difference. , 2005, Behavioral healthcare tomorrow.

[65]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health measurement scales , 2008 .

[66]  N. Bansback,et al.  Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: A critical review. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[67]  H. Sandvik,et al.  Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[68]  Allard J van der Beek,et al.  Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[69]  Pamela R. Johnson,et al.  The Organizational Benefits of Reducing Cyberslacking in the Workplace , 2003 .

[70]  H. Allen,et al.  Using Routinely Collected Data to Augment the Management of Health and Productivity Loss , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.