Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar spinal fusion has been an important reason behind the development of nonfusion stabilization technology. However, the incidence, prevalence, and factors contributing to adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine remain unclear. A range of prevalence rates for ASD have been reported in the lumbar spinal literature, but the annual incidence has not been widely studied in this region. Conflicting reports exist regarding risk factors, especially fusion length. PURPOSE To determine the annual incidence and prevalence of further surgery for adjacent segment disease (SxASD) after posterior lumbar arthrodesis and examine possible risk factors. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Nine hundred twelve patients who underwent 1,000 consecutive posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures, with mean follow-up duration of 63 months (range, 5 months-16 years). OUTCOME MEASURES Further surgery for ASD or surgery-free survival. METHODS A postal and telephone survey. Follow-up rate: 91% of patients. The annual incidence and prevalence of ASD requiring further surgery were determined using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. Cox proportional-hazards (Cox) regression was used for multivariate analysis of possible risk factors. Significance was set at p<.05. RESULTS Further surgery for ASD occurred following 130 of 1,000 or 13% of procedures at a mean time of 43 months (range, 2.3-162 months). The mean annual incidence of SxASD over the first 10 years, in all patients, was 2.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.9-3.1) with prevalences of 13.6% and 22.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Cox regression modeling found that the number of levels fused (p≤.0003), age of the patient, fusing to L5, and performing an additional laminectomy adjacent to a fusion all independently affect the risk of SxASD. The mean annual incidence figures in the first 10 years after a lumbar fusion were 1.7% (95% CI, 1.3-2.2) after fusion at single levels, 3.6% (2.1-5.2) after two levels, and 5.0% (3.3-6.7) after three and four levels. The 5- and 10-year prevalences were 9% and 16%, 17% and 31%, and 29% and 40% after single-, two-, and three-/four-level fusions, respectively. The risk of SxASD in patients younger than 45 years was one-quarter (95% CI, 10-64) the risk of patients older than 60 years (p=.003). A laminectomy adjacent to a fusion increases the relative risk by 2.4 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.2; p=.03). Stopping a fusion at L5 is associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.2-2.4; p=.007) of SxASD compared with a fusion to S1, for fusions of the same length. CONCLUSION The overall annual incidence and predicted 10-year prevalence of further surgery for ASD after lumbar arthrodesis were 2.5% and 22.2%, respectively. These rates varied widely depending on the identified risk factors. Although young patients who underwent single-level fusions were at low risk, patients who underwent fusion of three or four levels had a threefold increased risk of further surgery, compared with single-level fusions (p<.0001), and a predicted 10-year prevalence of 40%.

[1]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[2]  C. Shaffrey,et al.  SF-36 PCS Benefit-Cost Ratio of Lumbar Fusion Comparison to Other Surgical Interventions: A Thought Experiment , 2007, Spine.

[3]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  A Comparison of Radiographic Findings in Fusion and Nonfusion Patients Ten or More Years Following Lumbar Disc Surgery , 1979, Spine.

[4]  C. Uiterwaal,et al.  Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration After PLIF , 2004, Spine.

[7]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[8]  S Etebar,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  A. Minami,et al.  Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  B. Strömqvist,et al.  The Spondylolytic Vertebra and Its Adjacent Segment: Mobility Measured Before and After Posterolateral Fusion , 1997, Spine.

[11]  W. Sears Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure Measurements Above an Instrumented Fusion: A Cadaveric Study , 1995, Spine.

[13]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Long-term Follow-up of Lower Lumbar Fusion Patients , 1987, Spine.

[14]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[15]  C. Niu,et al.  Survivorship Analysis of DKS Instrumentation in the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  A. Disch,et al.  Higher Risk of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Floating Fusions: Long-Term Outcome After Low Lumbar Spine Fusions , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[17]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[18]  J. Jang,et al.  The Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for the Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Instrumented Lumbar Fusion , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[19]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[20]  Yongjung Kim,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up , 2007, Spine.

[21]  D. Togawa,et al.  Motion-preserving Surgery Can Prevent Early Breakdown of Adjacent Segments: Comparison of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization With Spinal Fusion , 2009, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[22]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  I. Stokes,et al.  Assessment of Patients With Low-Back Pain by Biplanar Radiographic Measurement of Intervertebral Motion , 1981, Spine.

[24]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  M. Cross,et al.  Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[26]  P. Mäntyselkä,et al.  Patients' versus general practitioners' assessments of pain intensity in primary care patients with non-cancer pain. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[27]  S. Masuda,et al.  Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation--a minimum 4-year follow-up. , 2008, Fukuoka igaku zasshi = Hukuoka acta medica.

[28]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  A. Davis,et al.  Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  M. Rahm,et al.  Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[31]  Michael Dunbar,et al.  Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[32]  Karon F Cook,et al.  The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[34]  F. Pellisé,et al.  Radiologic Assessment of All Unfused Lumbar Segments 7.5 Years After Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion , 2007, Spine.

[35]  Alexander R. Vaccaro,et al.  Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Disease After Arthrodesis and Total Disc Arthroplasty , 2008, Spine.

[36]  J. Schlegel,et al.  Lumbar Motion Segment Pathology Adjacent to Thoracolumbar, Lumbar, and Lumbosacral Fusions , 1996, Spine.

[37]  C. Wimmer,et al.  AP-translation in the proximal disc adjacent to lumbar spine fusion. A retrospective comparison of mono- and polysegmental fusion in 120 patients. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[38]  E. Wai,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20 Years After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2006, Spine.

[39]  N. Langrana,et al.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. , 1984, Spine.

[40]  L. Lenke,et al.  Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. , 1999, Spine.

[41]  W. Sears Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[42]  J. Lee,et al.  The Impact of Adjacent Segment Degeneration on the Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Spinal Fusion , 2008, Spine.

[43]  Philippe Gillet,et al.  The Fate of the Adjacent Motion Segments After Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[44]  Raj D. Rao,et al.  Biomechanical Changes at Adjacent Segments Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Tapered Cages , 2005, Spine.

[45]  N. Ordway,et al.  Radiostereometric Analysis of Postoperative Motion After Application of Dynesys Dynamic Posterior Stabilization System for Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[46]  B. Cunningham,et al.  The Effect of Spinal Destabilization and Instrumentation on Lumbar Intradiscal Pressure: An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis , 1997, Spine.

[47]  K. Kumano,et al.  Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.