Autonomous neuro-registration for robot-based neurosurgery

AbstractPurpose Neuro-registration is of primary importance as it has a bearing on the accuracy of neurosurgery. Although the accuracy of surgical robots is within the acceptable medical standards, the overall surgical accuracy is dictated by the errors in the neuro-registration process. The purpose of this work is to automate the neuro-registration process to improve the overall accuracy of the robot-based neurosurgery.MethodA highly accurate 6-degree-of-freedom Parallel Kinematic Mechanism (6D-PKM) robot is used for both neuro-registration and neurosurgery. In neuro-registration, after measurement of points in the medical image space, the end-platform of the 6D-PKM surgical robot carrying the camera will autonomously navigate towards the fiducial markers to measure its coordinates in the real patient space. An accurate relationship between the medical image space and the real patient space is established, and the same robot will navigate the surgical tool to the target.ResultsIn order to validate the proposed method for autonomous neuro-registration, experiments are performed using four phantoms. The four phantoms are as follows: PVC skull model, two acrylic blocks and a glass jar with coaxial shells. These phantoms are specifically designed to simulate the neurosurgical process. All the phantoms are registered successfully using the above-stated method. After autonomous neuro-registration, the coordinates of the target point are determined. Neurosurgery validation is carried out by attaching a 1-mm-diameter needle to the robot platform, which is autonomously traversed to reach the target point passing through the two 2-mm-diameter coaxial holes. The experiments are repeated, and the results reveal very good repeatability.ConclusionA method for autonomous neuro-registration has been developed. The robot has been successfully registered using the above method. After successful neuro-registration the overall accuracy of the robot-based neurosurgery is considerably improved. The other benefits of the above method are as follows: elimination of line-of-sight problem, no need of extra unit for neuro-registration, less time for registration, intraoperative registration, human error reduction and low cost.

[1]  Jesper Carl,et al.  Comparison of manual and automatic MR-CT registration for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  D. Paraskevopoulos,et al.  Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors , 2011, Neurosurgical Review.

[4]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in skull base surgery. , 1998, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  Bojan Jerbić,et al.  Automated Marker Localization in the Planning Phase of Robotic Neurosurgery , 2017, IEEE Access.

[6]  Gaurav Bhutani,et al.  Modeling design and development of frameless stereotaxy in robot assisted neurosurgery , 2015 .

[7]  M. Vavilala,et al.  Risks and benefits of patient positioning during neurosurgical care. , 2007, Anesthesiology clinics.

[8]  A. I. Kholyavin,et al.  Precision Stereotactic Frameless Neuronavigation , 2016, BioMed 2016.

[9]  Steffen Sammet,et al.  Effect of registration mode on neuronavigation precision: an exploration of the role of random error , 2012, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[10]  Neil D Gross,et al.  Robotic surgery of the head and neck. , 2014, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[11]  Ludvic Zrinzo,et al.  Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery , 2009 .

[12]  S. Sinha,et al.  Six DOF Mirror Alignment System for Beamline Applications , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[13]  Gaurav Bhutani,et al.  Generalized Point Correspondence Algorithm for Neuro-Registration , 2019 .

[14]  Abhishek Kaushik,et al.  Image-Based Data Preparation for Robot-Based Neurosurgery , 2019 .

[15]  Zhijian Song,et al.  Automatic localization of the center of fiducial markers in 3D CT/MRI images for image-guided neurosurgery , 2009, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  Andres M. Lozano,et al.  Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery , 2009 .

[17]  Ansgar M. Brambrink,et al.  Essentials of Neurosurgical Anesthesia & Critical Care , 2012 .

[18]  Bojan Jerbić,et al.  A novel robotic neuronavigation system: RONNA G3 , 2017 .

[19]  Oleg S. Pianykh,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[20]  B. Pirotte,et al.  The Zeiss-MKM system for frameless image-guided approach in epidural motor cortex stimulation for central neuropathic pain. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  M. Viergever,et al.  Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours , 2006, Journal of Neurology.

[22]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Intensity-based robust similarity for multimodal image registration , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[23]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry , 1999 .