Allocating surveillance effort in the management of invasive species: A spatially-explicit model

Invasive organisms often exist at low densities at the beginning and end of eradication programs. As a consequence, such organisms are often difficult to find, particularly if they are dispersed long distances to unknown locations. In such circumstances, large amounts of money can be spent searching for invasive organisms without finding any. However, chance encounters between invasive organisms and private citizens can occur even when invasive organisms exist at low densities. Reports of these 'passive detections' may be a critically important source of information for public pest management agencies. Rates of reporting may be improved using bounty payments and increasing public awareness about the presence of the invader. To explore the importance of passive surveillance in general, and its interaction with active surveillance by pest management agencies, we developed a simulation model of the spread of an invasive species. Simulations conducted under alternative scenarios for detection rates and search effort applied demonstrate that even small increases in detection or reporting rates substantially reduced eradication costs and increased the probability of eradication. In circumstances where resources are insufficient to achieve eradication, the simulation model provides useful information on the minimum expenditure required to contain the invasion.

[1]  D. Saupe Algorithms for random fractals , 1988 .

[2]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States , 2005 .

[3]  J. Bennett,et al.  Towards the Development of a Transferable Set of Value Estimates for Environmental Attributes , 2004 .

[4]  C. Jennings A brief history of the red imported fire ant eradication program , 2004 .

[5]  Douglas D. Buhler,et al.  Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[6]  David R. Smith,et al.  Application of adaptive cluster sampling to low-density populations of freshwater mussels , 2003, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[7]  Kimberly A. With The Landscape Ecology of Invasive Spread , 2002 .

[8]  S. Peck Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  S. Harris,et al.  Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive species , 2002 .

[10]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian non-linear spatio-temporal model for the spread of invasive species with application to the Eurasian Collared-Dove , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[11]  P. Driessche,et al.  Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. , 1996 .

[12]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence , 2004 .

[13]  A. Suarez,et al.  Predicting Argentine ant spread over the heterogeneous landscape using a spatially explicit stochastic model. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  S. J. Brooks,et al.  Processes leading to the detection of tropical weed infestations during an eradication program. , 2008 .

[15]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  The science of fractal images , 2011 .

[16]  Zewei Miao,et al.  Integrating data, biology, and decision models for invasive species management: application to leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). , 2008 .

[17]  Garry R. Griffith,et al.  The economic impact of weeds in Australia. , 2004 .

[18]  James Woodward,et al.  Biological invasions as global environmental change , 1996 .

[19]  Marius Gilbert,et al.  Long-distance dispersal and human population density allow the prediction of invasive patterns in the horse-chestnut leafminer Cameraria ohridella , 2004 .

[20]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  Rates of spread of an invading species - Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. , 1993 .

[21]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Modelling dispersal behaviour on a fractal landscape , 1998, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  Daniel Spring,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Eradicating an Invasion , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[24]  G. Seber,et al.  Adaptive Cluster Sampling , 2012 .

[25]  Marcel Rejmánek,et al.  When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal , 2003 .

[26]  David M Richardson,et al.  Predicting Plant Migration Rates in a Changing World: The Role of Long‐Distance Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Timo Vuorisalo,et al.  Hunting bounties as a key measure of historical wildlife management and game conservation: Finnish bounty schemes 1647–1975 , 2005, Oryx.

[28]  John E. Keith,et al.  The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach , 2002 .

[29]  R. Lawes,et al.  Evaluation of weed eradication programs: the delimitation of extent , 2005 .

[30]  E. Gese,et al.  Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management , 1999 .

[31]  R. Mason Foods of the Australian opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula, kerr) in New Zealand indigenous forest in the Orongorongo valley, Wellington , 1958 .

[32]  Daniel Spring,et al.  Applying Search Theory to Determine the Feasibility of Eradicating an Invasive Population in Natural Environments , 2007 .

[33]  T. Philippi,et al.  ADAPTIVE CLUSTER SAMPLING FOR ESTIMATION OF ABUNDANCES WITHIN LOCAL POPULATIONS OF LOW‐ABUNDANCE PLANTS , 2005 .

[34]  Hal Caswell,et al.  DEMOGRAPHY AND DISPERSAL: CALCULATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF INVASION SPEED FOR STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[35]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[36]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems , 1995 .