Yield and Nutritive Value Responses of Forage Barley Cultivars and Lines

Forage barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) has attracted attention as a potential crop in Japan; however, promising cultivars and lines have not been selected and selection criteria for breeding have not been found. This study aimed to determine the effects of cultivars and lines (Wasedorinijyo, Saikaikawa 67, Saikaihadaka 68, Hakei B 0878, Hakei B 0879, and Nishinochikara) on dry matter (DM) yield and nutritive value in southwestern Japan. In the 2010–2011 crop season at heading and soft dough, Hakei B 0879 had similar DM yield to the other cultivars and lines used. However, in the 2011–2012 crop season, Hakei B 0879 had the highest number of tillers and the highest DM yield among all the cultivars and lines. The number of emerged seedlings of Hakei B 0879 was much higher in the 2011–2012 crop season than in the 2010–2011 crop season. Thus, in the 2010–2011 crop season at soft dough, the DM yield of Hakei B 0879 was reduced because of the lower number of tillers. To stabilize the DM yield of Hakei B 0879, improved seedling emergence and growth at early stages could be important. In both crop seasons at heading and soft dough, DM yield was positively correlated with the number of tillers and leaf plus stem dry weight (DW). In addition, in both crop seasons at heading, the in vitro dry matter digestibly (IVDMD) concentration of Saikaikawa 67 was higher than, or similar to, those of the other cultivars and lines used because of the lower neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration. These results suggest that spike-number type cultivars may be more suitable for forage barley than spike-weight type cultivars and the number of tillers could be a selection criteria for breeding.

[1]  S. Morita,et al.  Forage Rice Yield and Quality Response to Harvest Timing and Nitrogen Management , 2011 .

[2]  S. Morita,et al.  Early Planting and Early Nitrogen Application Increase Stem Total Digestible Nutrient Concentration and Yield of Forage Rice in Southwestern Japan , 2011 .

[3]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of Cutting Height of the First Crop on Estimated Total Digestible Nutrient Concentration and Yield in Double-Harvested Rice , 2010 .

[4]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of Cutting Height and Trampling over Stubbles of the First Crop on Dry Matter Yield in Twice Harvesting of Forage Rice , 2009 .

[5]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of Planting Time and Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Yield of the Forage Rice Cultivar Tachiaoba in Southwestern Japan , 2009 .

[6]  Hiroshi Kato,et al.  Development of Rice Varieties for Whole Crop Silage (WCS) in Japan , 2008 .

[7]  S. Cai,et al.  Association Between Glutenin Alleles and Lanzhou Alkaline Stretched Noodle Quality of Northwest China Spring Wheats. II. Relationship with the Variations at the Glu-1 Loci , 2008 .

[8]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of planting time and cultivar on dry matter yield and estimated total digestible nutrient content of forage rice in southwestern Japan , 2008 .

[9]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of time of first harvest, total amount of nitrogen, and nitrogen application method on total dry matter yield in twice harvesting of rice , 2008 .

[10]  S. Morita,et al.  Effects of twice harvesting on total dry matter yield of rice , 2007 .

[11]  H. F. Mayland,et al.  Russian wildrye nutritive quality as affected by accession and environment , 2005 .

[12]  H. Nemoto,et al.  New Rice Varieties for Whole Crop Silage Use in Japan , 2003 .

[13]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Yield stability and development in two- and six-rowed winter barleys under Mediterranean conditions , 2003 .

[14]  V. Baron,et al.  Post-flowering forage potential of spring and winter cereal mixtures , 1992 .

[15]  B. Berkenkamp,et al.  MIXTURES OF ANNUAL CROPS FOR FORAGE IN CENTRAL ALBERTA , 1987 .

[16]  M. Casler,et al.  Relationship of Morphological Characteristics to Forage Quality in Quackgrass 1 , 1986 .

[17]  A. G. Matches,et al.  Genetic Variation and Interrelationships of In Vitro Dry Matter Disappearance and Fiber Content in Orchardgrass Herbage 1 , 1979 .

[18]  E. Kirby,et al.  Developmental consequences of two-row and six-row ear type in spring barley: 2. Shoot apex, leaf and tiller development , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[19]  R. K. Scott,et al.  Barley and its Environment. V. Stability of Grain Weight , 1975 .

[20]  J. Zadoks.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[21]  D. I. Jones,et al.  Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals , 1971, The Journal of Agricultural Science.