Video Analysis of Pedestrian Movement (VAPM) under Different Lighting Conditions—Method Exploration

When daylight hours are limited, pedestrians are dependent on appropriate outdoor lighting. Although new city lighting applications must consider both energy usage and pedestrian responses, current methods used to capture pedestrian walking behaviour during dark conditions in real settings are limited. This study reports on the development and evaluation of a video-based method that analyses pedestrians’ microscopic movements (VAPM—video analysis of pedestrian movements), including placement and speed, in an artificially lit outdoor environment. In a field study utilising between-subjects design, 62 pedestrians walked along the same path under two different lighting applications. VAPM accurately discriminated pedestrians’ microscopic movements in the two lighting applications. By incorporating methodological triangulation, VAPM successfully complemented observer-based assessments of pedestrians’ perceptions and evaluations of the two lighting applications. It is suggested that in evaluations of pedestrian responses to city lighting applications, observer-based assessments could be successfully combined with an analysis of actual pedestrian movement while walking in the lit environment. However, prior to employing a large-scale application of VAPM, the methodology needs to be further adapted for use with drones and integration into smart city lighting systems.

[1]  Peter Raynham,et al.  Disability glare: A study in simulated road lighting conditions , 2014 .

[2]  Kazunori Hanyu,et al.  VISUAL PROPERTIES AND AFFECTIVE APPRAISALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AFTER DARK , 1997 .

[3]  T. Laike,et al.  Improved Usability of Pedestrian Environments After Dark for People with Vision Impairment: an Intervention Study , 2020, Sustainability.

[4]  Mikael Nilsson,et al.  How Accurately Can We Measure from Video? Practical Considerations and Enhancements of the Camera Calibration Procedure , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[5]  J. Kerridge,et al.  Human Movement Behaviour in Urban Spaces: Implications for the Design and Modelling of Effective Pedestrian Environments , 2004 .

[6]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath , 2011 .

[7]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Using obstacle detection to identify appropriate illuminances for lighting in residential roads , 2013 .

[8]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning , 2016, SIAM Rev..

[9]  K. Korpela,et al.  Perceived restorativeness and walkway lighting in near-home environments , 2014 .

[10]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure of core affect. , 2007, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[11]  Christine H. Jazwinski,et al.  At the Mall With Children: Group Size and Pedestrian Economy of Movement , 2011 .

[12]  K. Painter The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark , 1996 .

[13]  MS Rea,et al.  Toward a model of outdoor lighting scene brightness , 2011 .

[14]  Jack L Nasar,et al.  Assessing perceptions of environments for active living. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  J. Nasar,et al.  Impressions of Lighting in Public Squares After Dark , 2017 .

[16]  K. Korpela,et al.  Restorative Lighting Environments : Does the Focus of Light Have an Effect on Restorative Experiences? , 2009 .

[17]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features , 1992 .

[18]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Automatic Traffic Data Collection under Varying Lighting and Temperature Conditions in Multimodal Environments: Thermal versus Visible Spectrum Video-Based Systems , 2017 .

[19]  C. Knight,et al.  Field surveys of the effect of lamp spectrum on the perception of safety and comfort at night , 2010 .

[20]  Pr Boyce,et al.  Road lighting and energy saving , 2009 .

[21]  S. Fotios,et al.  Using the daylight savings clock change to show ambient light conditions significantly influence active travel , 2017 .

[22]  Alexander Robitzsch,et al.  Multiple Imputation of Multilevel Missing Data , 2016, 1611.03112.

[23]  D. Walton,et al.  Field observations to determine the influence of population size, location and individual factors on pedestrian walking speeds , 2008, Ergonomics.

[24]  A whole-year approach showing that ambient light level influences walking and cycling , 2019 .

[25]  Anke Blöbaum,et al.  Perceived Danger in Urban Public Space , 2005 .

[26]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Dynamic pedestrian lighting: Effects on walking speed, legibility and environmental perception , 2018 .

[27]  Rob Methorst,et al.  Traffic conflicts on bicycle paths: a systematic observation of behaviour from video. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  JoKang-Hyun,et al.  Detection of pedestrian crossing road , 2017 .

[29]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  Maria Johansson,et al.  “In the evening, I don’t walk in the park”: The interplay between street lighting and greenery in perceived safety , 2020, URBAN DESIGN International.

[31]  Gernot Lenz,et al.  Impact of urban street lighting on road users’ perception of public space and mobility behavior , 2019, Building and Environment.

[32]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Perceived outdoor lighting quality POLQ. A lighting assessment tool , 2014 .

[33]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking , 2016 .

[34]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Appraising the intention of other people: Ecological validity and procedures for investigating effects of lighting for pedestrians , 2019 .

[35]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Developing evasive action‐based indicators for identifying pedestrian conflicts in less organized traffic environments , 2016 .

[36]  Jin-Seung Choi,et al.  Differences in gait pattern between the elderly and the young during level walking under low illumination. , 2014, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[37]  Rikard Küller,et al.  The subterranean work environment. Impact on well-being and health , 1996 .

[38]  Kang-Hyun Jo,et al.  Detection of pedestrian crossing road: A study on pedestrian pose recognition , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[39]  Linda Steg,et al.  Feeling Safe in the Dark , 2014 .

[40]  Yvonne A. W. de Kort,et al.  Tutorial: Theoretical Considerations When Planning Research on Human Factors in Lighting , 2019, LEUKOS.

[41]  David T. Herbert,et al.  Modifying the built environment: the impact of improved street lighting , 1994 .

[42]  Navaz Davoudian,et al.  Visual saliency of urban objects at night: Impact of the density of background light patterns , 2011 .

[43]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts , 2010 .

[44]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Affect grid : A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal , 1989 .

[45]  N. Itoh Visual guidance of walking: effects of illumination level and edge emphasis , 2006 .

[46]  A Antal Haans,et al.  Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape , 2012 .

[47]  Johan Rahm,et al.  Assessing the pedestrian response to urban outdoor lighting: A full-scale laboratory study , 2018, PloS one.