Earthquake building debris estimation in historic city centres: From real world data to experimental-based criteria

Abstract Safety and availability of urban paths in case of earthquake depend on buildings vulnerability and related produced debris on streets, especially in historic city centres. Predicting probable critical debris amounts on evacuation paths (i.e.: up to path blockage) can help safety planners to propose focused interventions on buildings, to design more effective emergency plans and to improve the effectiveness of rescuers’ actions while supporting evacuees during first emergency phases. This way, this work proposes new experimentally-based correlations aimed at estimating the amount of external debris for historic masonry buildings (in terms of percentage of facing street area occupied by debris and related debris depth) depending on the vulnerability of these buildings, on the seismic magnitude, and (for the first time) on the combination of these two factors and the path geometric ratio (i.e.: building height versus facing street width), so as to consider the effect of different urban contexts. Different vulnerability assessment methods are also considered to generalise the proposed methodology. Finally, starting from obtained experimental correlations, the method is tested on one case study to demonstrate its capabilities in post-earthquake scenario prevision. The method could be a fundamental tool for the assessment of possible paths blockages and “average” available space for evacuees’ emergency motion along paths. Localizing these emergency interferences on an urban map will allow planners to propose specific risk-reduction strategies in the urban scenario.

[1]  Sotiris Argyroudis,et al.  Accessibility modeling in earthquake case considering road closure probabilities: A case study of health and shelter service accessibility in Thessaloniki, Greece , 2016 .

[2]  G. Grünthal European Macroseismic Scale 1998 , 1998 .

[3]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[4]  Linda B. Bourque,et al.  Earthquakes and human behavior: A sociological perspective , 2017 .

[5]  Tomoya Shibayama,et al.  Risk awareness and intended tsunami evacuation behaviour of international tourists in Kamakura City, Japan , 2017 .

[6]  Tai-Lin Chin,et al.  An empirical evolutionary magnitude estimation for early warning of earthquakes , 2017 .

[7]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Comparing observed damages and losses with modelled ones using a probabilistic approach: the Lorca 2011 case , 2016 .

[8]  Sushma Srinivas,et al.  Classification of road damage due to earthquakes , 2011, Natural Hazards.

[9]  T. Ferreira,et al.  A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets , 2018 .

[10]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk: Buildings, Lifelines, Transportation Networks and Critical Facilities , 2014 .

[11]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Characterization of URM buildings and evaluation of damages in a historical center for the seismic risk mitigation and emergency management , 2017 .

[12]  Mattia De Amicis,et al.  A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of social vulnerability to seismic hazard in Italy , 2016 .

[13]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Urban scenarios modifications due to the earthquake: ruins formation criteria and interactions with pedestrians’ evacuation , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  Carlos Molina Hutt,et al.  Post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings in Portoviejo, Manabí province, following the Mw7.8 Ecuador earthquake of April 16, 2016 , 2017 .

[15]  Iraj Mohammadfam,et al.  Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review , 2017 .

[16]  V. Silva,et al.  Assessment of earthquake damage considering the characteristics of past events in South America , 2017 .

[17]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Systemic Seismic Risk Assessment of Road Networks Considering Interactions with the Built Environment , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[18]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Towards a "behavioural design" approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment , 2016 .

[19]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  A new design strategy based on a deterministic definition of the seismic input to overcome the limits of design procedures based on probabilistic approaches , 2015 .

[20]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks in urban areas , 2015 .

[21]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Approaches to the rapid seismic damage prediction of r/c buildings using artificial neural networks , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[22]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  New Indices for the Existing City-Centers Streets Network Reliability and Availability Assessment in Earthquake Emergency , 2018 .

[23]  Tiago Miguel Ferreira,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of the old city centre of Horta, Azores: calibration and application of a seismic vulnerability index method , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[24]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  The street as an area of human exposure in an earthquake aftermath: the case of Lorca, Spain, 2011 , 2017 .

[25]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry facade walls: development, application and validation of a new scoring method , 2014 .