Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: II. Practical implementation and algorithm optimization

Image quality is significantly degraded even by small amounts of patient motion in very high-resolution PET scanners. When patient motion is known, deconvolution methods can be used to correct the reconstructed image and reduce motion blur. This paper describes the implementation and optimization of an iterative deconvolution method that uses an ordered subset approach to make it practical and clinically viable. We performed ten separate FDG PET scans using the Hoffman brain phantom and simultaneously measured its motion using the Polaris Vicra tracking system (Northern Digital Inc., Ontario, Canada). The feasibility and effectiveness of the technique was studied by performing scans with different motion and deconvolution parameters. Deconvolution resulted in visually better images and significant improvement as quantified by the Universal Quality Index (UQI) and contrast measures. Finally, the technique was applied to human studies to demonstrate marked improvement. Thus, the deconvolution technique presented here appears promising as a valid alternative to existing motion correction methods for PET. It has the potential for deblurring an image from any modality if the causative motion is known and its effect can be represented in a system matrix.

[1]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[2]  N Raghunath,et al.  Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: I. Theoretical development and analysis in software simulations , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Motion compensation in histogram-mode and list-mode EM reconstructions: beyond the event-driven approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  T. Zeffiro,et al.  Head movement in normal subjects during simulated PET brain imaging with and without head restraint. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  C. J. Thompson,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  A. Rahmim,et al.  System Matrix Modeling of Externally Tracked Motion , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[8]  Roger Fulton,et al.  Correction for head movements in positron emission tomography using an optical motion tracking system , 2000 .

[9]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  Digitized video subject positioning and surveillance system for PET , 1995 .

[10]  M. S. Atkins,et al.  Compensation methods for head motion detected during PET imaging , 1996 .

[11]  Saowapak Sotthivirat,et al.  Statistical image recovery techniques for optical imaging systems. , 2003 .

[12]  C. Comtat,et al.  OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[13]  B. Lopresti,et al.  Implementation and performance of an optical motion tracking system for high resolution brain PET imaging , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[14]  L. Lucy An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[15]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Roger Fulton,et al.  The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .

[18]  Uwe Just,et al.  An accurate method for correction of head movement in PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.