Trends in Voter Surveillance in Western Societies: Privacy Intrusions and Democratic Implications

This paper surveys the various voter surveillance practices recently observed in the United States, assesses the extent to which they have been adopted in other democratic countries, and discusses the broad implications for privacy and democracy. Four broad trends are discussed:  the move from voter management databases to integrated voter management platforms; the shift from mass-messaging to micro-targeting employing personal data from commercial data brokerage firms; the analysis of social media and the social graph; and the decentralization of data to local campaigns through mobile applications. The de-alignment of the electorate in most Western societies has placed pressures on parties to target voters outside their traditional bases, and to find new, cheaper, and potentially more intrusive, ways to influence their political behavior. This paper builds on previous research to consider the theoretical tensions between concerns for excessive surveillance, and the broad democratic responsibility of parties to mobilize voters and increase political engagement. These issues have been insufficiently studied in the surveillance literature. They are not just confined to the privacy of the individual voter, but relate to broader dynamics in democratic politics.

[1]  John Peloza,et al.  The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action , 2014 .

[2]  Roy Coleman The new politics of surveillance and visibility. , 2007 .

[3]  J. Lees-Marshment The Political Marketing Game , 2011 .

[4]  T. Lipinski The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in Global Perspective , 2008 .

[5]  K. Haggerty,et al.  Surveillance and Democracy , 2010 .

[6]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[7]  P. Schwartz Privacy and Democracy in Cyberspace , 2000 .

[8]  Brian Chapman,et al.  Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1955 .

[9]  J. Lees-Marshment Global political marketing , 2009 .

[10]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The politics of privacy and the privacy of politics: Parties, elections and voter surveillance in Western democracies , 2013, First Monday.

[11]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Political parties and voter privacy: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and United States in comparative perspective , 2010, First Monday.

[12]  P. Furlong Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy , 1994 .

[13]  Katharine Armstrong,et al.  Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think , 2014 .

[14]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  Transparent Lives: Surveillance in Canada , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  S. Wolinetz,et al.  The transformation of Western European party systems revisited , 1979 .

[16]  Colin J. Bennett The Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance , 2008 .

[17]  Wayne Errington,et al.  Electoral databases: big brother or democracy unbound? , 2004 .

[18]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[19]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties without partisans : political change in advanced industrial democracies , 2000 .

[20]  P. Howard New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen , 2005 .

[21]  C. Pateman Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[22]  Kainan Chen No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state , 2017 .

[23]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[24]  R. Dalton Democratic challenges, democratic choices : the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies , 2004 .