Flux and energy requirement during ultrafiltration of a complex industrial process stream

Membrane filtration is a separation process already used in many industrial applications. However, optimization of the design and operating conditions is necessary to lower the investment and operating costs. To achieve this for industrial (multi-component) process streams, a combination of experiments and calculations is needed. The permeate flux and energy requirement are important design parameters for ultrafiltration plants. The influence of the operating conditions on these factors should therefore be investigated. In this work, bench-scale filtration experiments were performed on kraft black liquor using a ceramic membrane. The experimental data were used to calculate the average flux and energy requirement for different transmembrane pressures and cross-flow velocities. The optimal flux at different inlet cross-flow velocities was found to vary depending on feed concentration and transmembrane pressure.

[1]  Mark Wilf.  Design consequences of recent improvements in membrane performance , 1997 .

[2]  Anna-Karin Nordin,et al.  Influence of module configuration on total economics during ultrafiltration at high concentration , 2010 .

[3]  K. Kroner,et al.  Controlled shear filtration: A novel technique for animal cell separation. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Vassilis Gekas,et al.  Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow , 1987 .

[5]  Anna-Karin Nordin,et al.  Flux decline along the flow channel in tubular ultrafiltration modules , 2009 .

[6]  C. A. Smolders,et al.  Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration , 1989 .

[7]  O. Wallberg,et al.  Ultrafiltration of kraft black liquor with a ceramic membrane , 2003 .

[8]  H. Yeh,et al.  Effects of design and operating parameters on the declination of permeate flux for membrane ultrafiltration along hollow-fiber modules , 2003 .

[9]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Fluid mechanics and cross-flow filtration: some thoughts , 1985 .

[10]  Sunando DasGupta,et al.  Prediction of mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent flow in cross flow ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[11]  James W. Murdock.  Fluid mechanics and its applications , 1976 .

[12]  R. Field,et al.  Limiting flux in membrane separations: A model based on the viscosity dependency of the mass transfer coefficient , 1992 .

[13]  R. Field,et al.  The ultrafiltration of viscous fluids , 1995 .

[14]  R. van Reis,et al.  A dynamic film model for ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[15]  Anna-Karin Nordin,et al.  Case study of an ultrafiltration plant treating bleach plant effluent from a pulp and paper mill , 2006 .

[16]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  Optimal design and operation of continuous ultrafiltration plants , 2004 .

[17]  H. Yeh,et al.  Momentum balance analysis of flux and pressure declines in membrane ultrafiltration along tubular modules , 2004 .

[18]  Lianfa Song,et al.  Simulations of Full-Scale Reverse Osmosis Membrane Process , 2002 .

[19]  J. I. Arribas,et al.  Mass transfer coefficient and retention of PEGs in low pressure cross-flow ultrafiltration through asymmetric membranes , 1995 .

[20]  Alan S. Michaels,et al.  SOLUTE POLARIZATION AND CAKE FORMATION IN MEMBRANE ULTRAFILTRATION: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES , 1970 .

[21]  Jean-Louis Maubois,et al.  Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry , 2000 .

[22]  Gunnar Eigil Jonsson,et al.  Flow dynamics and concentration polarisation in spacer-filled channels☆ , 2002 .

[23]  G. Belfort,et al.  Global Model for Optimizing Crossflow Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Processes: A New Predictive and Design Tool , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[24]  Sirshendu De,et al.  Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration , 1997 .

[25]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.