A Framework of Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypotheses

The strong exponential-time hypothesis (SETH) is a commonly used conjecture in the field of complexity theory. It essentially states that determining whether a CNF formula is satisfiable can not be done faster than exhaustive search over all possible assignments. This hypothesis and its variants gave rise to a fruitful field of research, fine-grained complexity, obtaining (mostly tight) lower bounds for many problems in P whose unconditional lower bounds are very likely beyond current techniques. In this work, we introduce an extensive framework of Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypotheses, as quantum analogues to what SETH is for classical computation. Using the QSETH framework, we are able to translate quantum query lower bounds on black-box problems to conditional quantum time lower bounds for many problems in P. As an example, we provide a conditional quantum time lower bound of Ω(n1.5) for the Longest Common Subsequence and Edit Distance problems. We also show that the n2 SETH-based lower bound for a recent scheme for Proofs of Useful Work carries over to the quantum setting using our framework, maintaining a quadratic gap between verifier and prover. Lastly, we show that the assumptions in our framework can not be simplified further with relativizing proof techniques, as they are false in relativized worlds. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness; Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory

[1]  PaturiRamamohan,et al.  An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT , 2005 .

[2]  Dániel Marx,et al.  Exponential Time Complexity of the Permanent and the Tutte Polynomial , 2010, TALG.

[3]  Mohammad Ghodsi,et al.  Approximating Edit Distance in Truly Subquadratic Time: Quantum and MapReduce , 2018, SODA.

[4]  Amir Abboud,et al.  Tight Hardness Results for LCS and Other Sequence Similarity Measures , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  John Gill,et al.  Relativizations of the P =? NP Question , 1975, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Karl Bringmann,et al.  Why Walking the Dog Takes Time: Frechet Distance Has No Strongly Subquadratic Algorithms Unless SETH Fails , 2014, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Virginia Vassilevska Williams,et al.  Hardness of Easy Problems: Basing Hardness on Popular Conjectures such as the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (Invited Talk) , 2015, IPEC.

[8]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles , 2004, STACS.

[9]  Amir Abboud,et al.  Quadratic-Time Hardness of LCS and other Sequence Similarity Measures , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false) , 2014, STOC.

[11]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Quantum complexity theory , 1993, STOC.

[12]  Robin Kothari,et al.  An optimal quantum algorithm for the oracle identification problem , 2013, STACS.

[13]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Tight bounds on quantum searching , 1996, quant-ph/9605034.

[14]  Oren Weimann,et al.  Consequences of Faster Alignment of Sequences , 2014, ICALP.

[15]  V. V. Williams ON SOME FINE-GRAINED QUESTIONS IN ALGORITHMS AND COMPLEXITY , 2019, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM 2018).

[16]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Quantum Lower and Upper Bounds for 2D-Grid and Dyck Language , 2020, MFCS.

[17]  Amit Sahai,et al.  On the (im)possibility of obfuscating programs , 2001, JACM.

[18]  Ryan Williams,et al.  Simulating branching programs with edit distance and friends: or: a polylog shaved is a lower bound made , 2015, STOC.

[19]  Mike Paterson,et al.  A Faster Algorithm Computing String Edit Distances , 1980, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[20]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  Complexity of k-SAT , 1999, Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317).

[21]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments , 2000, STOC '00.

[22]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  Quantum lower bounds by polynomials , 2001, JACM.

[23]  A Framework of Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypotheses , 2021 .

[24]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[25]  Michael E. Saks,et al.  Approximating Edit Distance within Constant Factor in Truly Sub-Quadratic Time , 2018, 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[26]  M. Sipser,et al.  Limit on the Speed of Quantum Computation in Determining Parity , 1998, quant-ph/9802045.

[27]  Mario Szegedy,et al.  Explicit Lower Bounds on Strong Quantum Simulation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  A Quantum Query Complexity Trichotomy for Regular Languages , 2019, 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[29]  Ryan Williams,et al.  A new algorithm for optimal 2-constraint satisfaction and its implications , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[31]  Michael E. Saks,et al.  An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT , 2005, JACM.

[32]  Yoshio Okamoto,et al.  On Problems as Hard as CNF-SAT , 2011, 2012 IEEE 27th Conference on Computational Complexity.

[33]  S. Aaronson,et al.  On the quantum complexity of closest pair and related problems , 2019, CCC.

[34]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  A duality between clause width and clause density for SAT , 2006, 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'06).

[35]  Marvin Künnemann,et al.  Quadratic Conditional Lower Bounds for String Problems and Dynamic Time Warping , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[36]  Tomoyuki Morimae,et al.  Fine-grained quantum computational supremacy , 2019, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[37]  Huacheng Yu,et al.  Matching Triangles and Basing Hardness on an Extremely Popular Conjecture , 2015, STOC.

[38]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  Does Looking Inside a Circuit Help? , 2017, MFCS.

[39]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  Which problems have strongly exponential complexity? , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[40]  Prashant Nalini Vasudevan,et al.  Proofs of Useful Work , 2017, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..