A paired-image radiation transport model for skeletal dosimetry.

UNLABELLED Toxicity of the hematopoietically active bone marrow continues to be a primary limitation in radionuclide therapies of cancer. Improved techniques for patient-specific skeletal dosimetry are thus crucial to the development of dose-response relationships needed to optimize these therapies (i.e., avoid both marrow toxicity and tumor underdosing). Current clinical methods of skeletal dose assessment rely heavily on a single set of bone and marrow cavity chord-length distributions in which particle energy deposition is tracked within an infinite extent of trabecular spongiosa, with no allowance for particle escape to cortical bone. In the present study, we introduce a paired-image radiation transport (PIRT) model that can provide a more realistic 3-dimensional geometry for particle transport of the skeletal site at both microscopic and macroscopic levels of its histology. METHODS Ex vivo CT scans were acquired of the lumbar vertebra and right proximal femur excised from a 66-y male cadaver (body mass index, 22.7 kg m(-2)). For both skeletal sites, regions of trabecular spongiosa and cortical bone were identified and segmented. Physical sections of interior spongiosa were then taken and subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) microscopy. Voxels within the resulting NMR microimages were segmented and labeled into regions of bone trabeculae, endosteum, active marrow, and inactive marrow. The PIRT methodology was then implemented within the EGSnrc radiation transport code, whereby electrons of various initial energies are simultaneously tracked within both the ex vivo CT macroimage and the NMR microimage of the skeletal site. RESULTS At electron initial energies greater than 50-200 keV, a divergence in absorbed fractions to active marrow is noted between PIRT model simulations and those estimated under infinite spongiosa transport techniques. Calculations of radionuclide S values under both methodologies imply that current chord-based models used in clinical skeletal dosimetry can overestimate dose to active bone marrow in these 2 skeletal sites by approximately 4%-23% for low-energy beta-emitters ((33)P, (169)Er, and (177)Lu), by approximately 4%-25% for intermediate-energy beta-emitters ((153)Sm, (186)Re, and (89)Sr), and by approximately 11%-30% for high-energy beta-emitters ((32)P, (188)Re, and (90)Y). CONCLUSION The PIRT methodology allows for detailed modeling of the 3D macrostructure of individual marrow-containing bones within the skeleton, thus permitting improved estimates of absorbed fractions and radionuclide S values for intermediate-to-high beta-emitters.

[1]  H. Kawamura,et al.  Introduction to the ICRP Publication 70, “Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: The Skeleton” , 1996 .

[2]  K. Eckerman Aspects of the dosimetry of radionuclides within the skeleton with particular emphasis on the active marrow , 1985 .

[3]  C. R. Richmond ICRP Publication 23 , 1985 .

[4]  W E Bolch,et al.  Creation of two tomographic voxel models of paediatric patients in the first year of life. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  F. Spiers DOSE TO TRABECULAR BONE FROM INTERNAL BETA-EMITTERS , 1968 .

[6]  F. Spiers DOSIMETRY AT INTERFACES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BONE. , 1968 .

[7]  W E Bolch,et al.  S values for radionuclides localized within the skeleton. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  J. Turner,et al.  A phase II study of treatment of painful multifocal skeletal metastases with single and repeated dose samarium-153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[9]  K F Eckerman,et al.  Electron absorbed fractions and dose conversion factors for marrow and bone by skeletal regions. , 1994, Health physics.

[10]  A. J. van Rensburg,et al.  Quantifying the radiation dosage to individual skeletal lesions treated with samarium-153-EDTMP. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Adipocyte spatial distributions in bone marrow: implications for skeletal dosimetry models. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  W. Bolch,et al.  Chord distributions across 3D digital images of a human thoracic vertebra. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  W. Bolch,et al.  NMR microscopy of trabecular bone and its role in skeletal dosimetry. , 1998, Health physics.

[14]  C. W. Mays,et al.  Delayed Effects of Bone-Seeking Radionuclides , 1970 .

[15]  C. Chapman,et al.  Samarium-153-EDTMP in bone metastases of hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  W. Bolch,et al.  Beta-particle dosimetry of the trabecular skeleton using Monte Carlo transport within 3D digital images. , 2001, Medical physics.

[17]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[18]  W. Brenner,et al.  Skeletal uptake and soft-tissue retention of 186Re-HEDP and 153Sm-EDTMP in patients with metastatic bone disease. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  A. Beddoe,et al.  Measurements of trabecular bone structure in man. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  W E Bolch,et al.  A three-dimensional transport model for determining absorbed fractions of energy for electrons within trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  W. Bolch,et al.  Considerations of anthropometric, tissue volume, and tissue mass scaling for improved patient specificity of skeletal S values. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Considerations of marrow cellularity in 3-dimensional dosimetric models of the trabecular skeleton. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  S. Baltacı,et al.  Palliative analgesic effect of Re-186 HEDP in various cancer patients with bone metastases , 2000, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[24]  I. Kawrakow Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. , 2000, Medical physics.

[25]  F. Spiers Radiotherapeutic physics. II. Dosage in irradiated soft tissue and bone. , 1951, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  C. Kosmas,et al.  Preliminary results of the use of Re-186-HEDP for palliation of pain in patients with metastatic bone disease. , 2000, American journal of clinical oncology.

[27]  M G Stabin,et al.  MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  W. Bolch,et al.  Site-specific variability in trabecular bone dosimetry: considerations of energy loss to cortical bone. , 2001, Medical physics.

[29]  R. A. Holmes,et al.  Samarium-153-EDTMP: pharmacokinetic, toxicity and pain response using an escalating dose schedule in treatment of metastatic bone cancer. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  D. Cormack Medical Radionuclides. Radiation Dose and Effects. R. J. Cloutier , C. L. Edwards , W. S. Snyder , 1970 .

[31]  J. Valentin Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[32]  F. Spiers,et al.  Calculated beta-ray dose factors for trabecular bone. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  K F Eckerman,et al.  Availability of nuclear decay data in electronic form, including beta spectra not previously published. , 1994, Health physics.

[34]  F. Spiers A review of the theoretical and experimental methods of determining radiation dose in bone. , 1966, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  K. Eckerman,et al.  Evolution and status of bone and marrow dose models. , 2002, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[36]  B. Wessels,et al.  Marrow toxicity and radiation absorbed dose estimates from rhenium-186-labeled monoclonal antibody. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  F. Spiers BETA PARTICLE DOSIMETRY IN TRABECULAR BONE. , 1969 .

[38]  A. Beddoe,et al.  Measurements of trabecular bone structure in man (for radionuclide dosimetry , 1976 .

[39]  James A. Scott Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues ICRU Report 46. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1992, $40.00 , 1993 .

[40]  W. Bolch,et al.  SKELETAL DOSIMETRY VIA NMR MICROSCOPY: INVESTIGATIONS OF SAMPLE REPRODUCIBILITY AND SIGNAL SOURCE , 2002, Health physics.