Use of (Time-Domain) Vector Autoregressions to Test Uncovered Interest Parity

In this paper, a vector autoregression model (VAR) is proposed in order to test uncovered interest parity (UIP) in the foreign exchange market. Consider a VAR system of the spot exchange rate (yen/dollar), the domestic (US) interest rate and the foreign (Japanese) interest rate, describing the interdependence of the domestic and international financia lmarkets. Uncovered interest parity is stated as a null hypothesis that the current difference between the two interest rates is equal to the difference between the expected future (log of) exchange rate and the (log of) current spot exchange rate. Note that the VAR system will yield the expected future spot exchange rate as a k-step ahead unconditional prediction. Hence, the null hypothesis is stated as nonlinear cross-equational restrictions for the three-equation VAR system. Then UIP is tested by the Wald test between the unrestricted and restricted systems. A test of UIP with a maintained hypothesis of covered interest parity, becomes a hypothesis test of efficiency without risk premium, that is,the forward exchange rate isthe unbiased predictor of the future spot exchange rate, and information is efficiently used in its prediction. Our results are compared to the efficiency test with a single equation using the Hansen-Hodrick procedure for the same data set.

[1]  L. Hansen,et al.  Chapter Title: Risk Averse Speculation in the Forward Foreign Exchange Market: An Econometric Analysis of Linear Models , 1983 .

[2]  C. Sims.  MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .

[3]  Bradford Cornell,et al.  Spot rates, forward rates and exchange market efficiency , 1977 .

[4]  Michael K. Salemi.  The Forward Exchange Rate, Expectations, and the Demand for Money-The German Hyperinflation: Comment , 1980 .

[5]  M. Obstfeld,et al.  International Interest-Rate and Price-Level Linkages Under Flexible Exchange Rates: A Review of Recent Evidence , 1985 .

[6]  L. Hansen.  Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[7]  Richard T. Baillie,et al.  Testing rational expectations and efficiency in the foreign exchange market , 1983 .

[8]  Jacob A. Frenkel,et al.  Flexible Exchange Rates, Prices, and the Role of "News": Lessons from the 1970s , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  T. Sargent,et al.  Exact linear rational expectations models: specification and estimation , 1981 .

[10]  Siddhartha Paul Tiwari,et al.  Capital Controls and Interest Rate Parity: The Japanese Experience, 1978-81 (Regulation des capitaux et niveau des taux d'interet: le cas du Japon, 1978-81) (Control de capitales y paridad de los tipos de interes: la experiencia de Japon, 1978-81) , 1981 .

[11]  Thomas H. McCurdy,et al.  Testing the Unbiasedness Hypothesis in the Forward Foreign Exchange Market: A Specification Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  J. Frenkel.  Further Evidence on Expectations and the Demand for Money During the German Hyperinflation , 1978 .

[13]  Jacob A Frenkel.  Exchange Rates and International Macroeconomics , 1983 .

[14]  Craig S. Hakkio.  The Term Structure of the Forward Premium , 1980 .

[15]  Sanjay Srivastava,et al.  An Investigation of Risk and Return in Forward Foreign Exchange , 1983 .

[16]  W. Branson,et al.  A Model of Exchange-Rate Determination with Policy Reaction: Evidence from Monthly Data , 1983 .

[17]  R. Hodrick.  International asset pricing with time-varying risk premia , 1981 .

[18]  Dave Longworth.  Testing the Efficiency of the Canadian-U.S. Exchange Market under the Assumption of no Risk Premium , 1981 .

[19]  Richard M. Levich.  Further Results on the Efficiency of Markets for Foreign Exchange , 1978 .

[20]  J. Geweke,et al.  Some Joint Tests of the Efficiency of Markets for Forward Foreign Exchange , 1979 .