Adaptation of rammed earth to modern construction systems: Comparative study of thermal behavior under summer conditions

Buildings should be understood as a process that consumes energy in all their phases (design, construction, use and end-of-life) and, more specifically, the building envelope is clearly involved in all of them. For this reason, the International Energy Agency defines in its latest publication the improvement of building envelopes as one of the key points to reduce the energy consumption in buildings. In the present study, two sustainable construction systems based on rammed earth walls are adapted to modern requirements to be thermally tested and compared against three Mediterranean conventional systems under summer conditions. The experimentation was done by performing several experiments in free floating and controlled temperature conditions at real scale in five cubicle-shape buildings with inner dimensions 2.4×2.4×2.4m. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that more sustainable construction systems can be used instead of conventional ones, with higher embodied energy, and achieve similar thermal response. Results show that the reduction of rammed earth wall thickness strongly penalizes its thermal behavior. However, similar thermal response than conventional systems is reached when 6cm of wooden insulation panels are added in the outer face of the cubicle-shape building.

[1]  Xudong Yang,et al.  Characterizing the household energy consumption in heritage Nanjing Tulou buildings, China: A comparative field survey study , 2012 .

[2]  Robert Fuller,et al.  Energy use and thermal comfort in a rammed earth office building , 2008 .

[3]  Monica Rossi.  Innovative façades: lightweight and thin systems with high inertia for the thermal comfort. Application in office buildings in Southern Europe , 2011 .

[4]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Sustainable materials for low carbon buildings , 2009 .

[5]  Xiang Dong,et al.  Design optimization of insulated cavity rammed earth walls for houses in Australia , 2015 .

[6]  Ka Heathcote,et al.  The thermal performance of earth buildings , 2011 .

[7]  Vítor Leal,et al.  A sustainability assessment of advanced materials for novel housing solutions , 2015 .

[8]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[9]  Angela Sasic Kalagasidis,et al.  Retrofitting of a listed brick and wood building using vacuum insulation panels on the exterior of the facade: Measurements and simulations , 2014 .

[10]  Mohamed M. Mahdy,et al.  Prediction of future energy consumption reduction using GRC envelope optimization for residential buildings in Egypt , 2014 .

[11]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Experimental study on the performance of insulation materials in Mediterranean construction , 2010 .

[12]  Natale Arcuri,et al.  Dynamic Thermal Characteristics of Opaque Building Components. A Proposal for the Extension of EN ISO 13786 , 2015 .

[13]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Environmental impacts of natural and conventional building materials: a case study on earth plasters , 2014 .

[14]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Dynamic thermal performance of alveolar brick construction system , 2011 .

[15]  Rahman Azari.  Integrated energy and environmental life cycle assessment of office building envelopes , 2014 .

[16]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[17]  Baizhan Li,et al.  The effect of building envelope insulation on cooling energy consumption in summer , 2014 .

[18]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Energy, comfort and environmental assessment of different building envelope techniques in a Mediterranean climate with a hot dry summer , 2014 .

[19]  F. Bruno,et al.  Impact of climate change on the design of energy efficient residential building envelopes , 2015 .

[20]  Kenneth Ip,et al.  Thermal behaviour of an earth-sheltered autonomous building – The Brighton Earthship , 2007 .

[21]  Evyatar Erell,et al.  Energy retrofit of residential building envelopes in Israel: A cost-benefit analysis , 2014 .

[22]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[23]  A. Campos-Celador,et al.  Energy and economic assessment of the envelope retrofitting in residential buildings in Northern Spain , 2015 .