Cancer risk estimation in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations and voxel phantoms.

The aim of this work was to estimate the risk of radiation induced cancer following the Portuguese breast screening recommendations for Digital Mammography (DM) when applied to Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and to evaluate how the risk to induce cancer could influence the energy used in breast diagnostic exams. The organ doses were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations using a female voxel phantom and considering the acquisition of 25 projection images. Single organ cancer incidence risks were calculated in order to assess the total effective radiation induced cancer risk. The screening strategy techniques considered were: DBT in Cranio-Caudal (CC) view and two-view DM (CC and Mediolateral Oblique (MLO)). The risk of cancer incidence following the Portuguese screening guidelines (screening every two years in the age range of 50-80years) was calculated by assuming a single CC DBT acquisition view as standalone screening strategy and compared with two-view DM. The difference in the total effective risk between DBT and DM is quite low. Nevertheless in DBT an increase of risk for the lung is observed with respect to DM. The lung is also the organ that is mainly affected when non-optimal beam energy (in terms of image quality and absorbed dose) is used instead of an optimal one. The use of non-optimal energies could increase the risk of lung cancer incidence by a factor of about 2.

[1]  Keith F. Eckerman,et al.  GSF male and female adult voxel models representing ICRP reference man-The present status , 2005 .

[2]  Nancy L Keating,et al.  New Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening in US Women. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  V. Cassola,et al.  Posture-specific phantoms representing female and male adults in Monte Carlo-based simulations for radiological protection. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[5]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study , 2015, European Radiology.

[6]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. , 2008, Radiology.

[8]  D. Brenner,et al.  We can do better than effective dose for estimating or comparing low-dose radiation risks , 2012, Annals of the ICRP.

[9]  Paul DeLuca,et al.  Realistic reference phantoms: An ICRP/ICRU joint effort , 2009, Annals of the ICRP.

[10]  N. Saul,et al.  米国放射線科医学会(ACR)認定ファントムを用いてコンピュータ断層撮影(CT)変調用変成機能(MTF)およびノイズパワースペクトル(NPS)を測定するための単純なアプローチ , 2013 .

[11]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrew England,et al.  A method for calculating effective lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer from screening mammography , 2015 .

[13]  N Matela,et al.  Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[14]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  I. Sechopoulos A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[16]  X George Xu,et al.  An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. , 2012, Radiology.

[18]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[20]  Pedro Almeida,et al.  Image quality and dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: A Monte Carlo study , 2014 .

[21]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  A. Auricchio,et al.  Estimates of lifetime attributable risk of cancer after a single radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography , 2010, Heart.

[23]  R. Edward Hendrick,et al.  Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography , 2013, European Radiology.