Integrating Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cues into a Minimal Model of Lineage Commitment for Hematopoietic Progenitors
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Tenen,et al. The macrophage transcription factor PU.1 directs tissue-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.
[2] S. Orkin,et al. Functional analysis and in vivo footprinting implicate the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 as a positive regulator of its own promoter. , 1991, Genes & development.
[3] K. Akashi,et al. GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages. , 2003, Immunity.
[4] L. Robb,et al. Cytokine receptors and hematopoietic differentiation , 2007, Oncogene.
[5] P. Lásló,et al. Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.
[6] Sui Huang,et al. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.
[7] J. Ferrell. Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.
[8] D. Gillespie. Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .
[9] Daniel G. Tenen,et al. Transcription factors in myeloid development: balancing differentiation with transformation , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[10] R. Flavell,et al. The different faces of Notch in T-helper-cell differentiation , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[11] Ingo Roeder,et al. Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[12] Irving L Weissman,et al. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.
[13] Santhosh Palani,et al. Positive receptor feedback during lineage commitment can generate ultrasensitivity to ligand and confer robustness to a bistable switch. , 2008, Biophysical journal.
[14] D. Tenen,et al. PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells. , 1995, Oncogene.
[15] J Halloy,et al. Deterministic Versus Stochastic Models for Circadian Rhythms , 2002, Journal of biological physics.
[16] Peter Guttorp,et al. Evidence that hematopoiesis may be a stochastic process in vivo , 1996, Nature Medicine.
[17] T. Enver,et al. Do stem cells play dice? , 1998, Blood.
[18] Merlin Crossley,et al. Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[19] R. Callard,et al. Immunology and mathematics: crossing the divide , 2005, Immunology.
[20] I. Weissman,et al. Identification of Clonogenic Common Lymphoid Progenitors in Mouse Bone Marrow , 1997, Cell.
[21] Lina A. Thoren,et al. Identification of Flt3+ Lympho-Myeloid Stem Cells Lacking Erythro-Megakaryocytic Potential A Revised Road Map for Adult Blood Lineage Commitment , 2005, Cell.
[22] D. Tenen,et al. PU.1 (Spi-1) and C/EBP alpha regulate expression of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor alpha gene , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[23] D. Tenen,et al. PU.1 (Spi-1) and C/EBP alpha regulate the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter in myeloid cells. , 1996, Blood.
[24] Richard Dahl,et al. Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU.1:C/EBPα ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor , 2003, Nature Immunology.
[25] A. Arkin,et al. Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Donald Metcalf,et al. Hematopoietic cytokines. , 2008, Blood.
[27] D. Metcalf. Lineage commitment and maturation in hematopoietic cells: the case for extrinsic regulation. , 1998, Blood.
[28] Y. Ikawa,et al. GATA-1 transactivates erythropoietin receptor gene, and erythropoietin receptor-mediated signals enhance GATA-1 gene expression. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.
[29] Fraser McBlane,et al. Molecular Signatures of Self-Renewal, Differentiation, and Lineage Choice in Multipotential Hemopoietic Progenitor Cells In Vitro , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[30] I. Weissman,et al. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages , 2000, Nature.
[31] Catherine M. Verfaillie,et al. The molecular repertoire of the 'almighty' stem cell , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[32] B. Kholodenko,et al. Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.
[33] James E. Ferrell,et al. Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. , 2001, Chaos.
[34] Philipp S. Hoppe,et al. Hematopoietic Cytokines Can Instruct Lineage Choice , 2009, Science.
[35] H. Lodish,et al. Erythropoietin stimulates phosphorylation and activation of GATA-1 via the PI3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway. , 2006, Blood.
[36] Claude Desplan,et al. Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.
[37] A B Cantor,et al. Hematopoietic development: a balancing act. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[38] D. A. Baxter,et al. Dynamics of a minimal model of interlocked positive and negative feedback loops of transcriptional regulation by cAMP-response element binding proteins. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[39] Jing Wu,et al. GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[40] Hannah H. Chang,et al. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.