Learning from analogy‐enhanced science text

The present study examined the role that an elaborate analogy can play when middle school students learn a major concept from a science text. The elaborate analogy had both graphic and text components that integrated and mapped key features from an analog (a factory) to the target concept (an animal cell). The target features were the functions of the cell parts. In Experiment 1, eighth graders who studied an analogy-enhanced text had greater immediate and 2-week recall of cell-part functions than students who studied a control text. In Experiment 2, sixth graders who studied an analogy-enhanced text considered the target concept to be more understandable than students who studied a control text. The sixth graders who studied the analogy-enhanced text also had greater immediate and 2-week retention, as measured by both recall and recognition. In both experiments, the analogy was interpreted as acting as a mediator between the students' existing knowledge and the new knowledge in the text. The analogy mapped a familiar, concrete schema onto that of the target concept, making the target concept more understandable and memorable. Implications for the meaningful learning of science text are discussed. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 35: 1129–1149, 1998.

[1]  Ray S. Perez,et al.  The use of knowledge acquisition in instructional design , 1988 .

[2]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[3]  P. Thagard,et al.  Analogy, Explanation, and Education. , 1992 .

[4]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Reading and Writing to Learn Science: Achieving Scientific Literacy. , 1994 .

[5]  Barbara S. Spector,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Middle School Students' Perceptions of Factors Facilitating the Learning of Science: Grounded Theory and Existing Theory. , 1991 .

[6]  David F. Treagust,et al.  The nature and extent of analogies in secondary chemistry textbooks , 1994 .

[7]  L. Thomas The Lives of a Cell , 1974 .

[8]  S. Glynn,et al.  Conceptual Bridges: Using Analogies to Explain Scientific Concepts. , 1995 .

[9]  J. Stewart,et al.  Revising explanatory models to accommodate anomalous genetic phenomena: Problem solving in the “context of discovery” , 1995 .

[10]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[11]  J. Primack,et al.  Project 2061: Science for All Americans. , 1989, The Physiologist.

[12]  Alan Searleman,et al.  Memory from a Broader Perspective , 1994 .

[13]  David E. Brown Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change , 1992 .

[14]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics , 1993 .

[15]  M. Pressley,et al.  Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment , 1995 .

[16]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[17]  Harry Singer,et al.  Learning Concepts from Biology Text Through Pictorial Analogies and an Analogical Study Guide , 1990 .

[18]  Fred N. Finley,et al.  Teachers perceptions of important and difficult science content , 1982 .

[19]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Analogies in Biology Education: A Contentious Issue. , 1997 .

[20]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[21]  MARIE K. IDING,et al.  How analogies foster learning from science texts , 1997 .

[22]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[23]  Kathleen E. Metz Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[24]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The importance of analogy: A prelude to the special issue , 1993 .

[25]  L. Schauble,et al.  Building Functional Models: Designing an Elbow , 1997 .

[26]  Zoubeida R. Dagher,et al.  Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education , 1995 .

[27]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[28]  R. Duit On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[29]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Analogies in chemistry textbooks , 1995 .

[30]  Mary Hesse,et al.  Models and analogies in science , 1970 .

[31]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[32]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[33]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .

[34]  R. Oppenheimer Analogy in science. , 1956 .

[35]  L. Schauble,et al.  Reasoning about Structure and Function: Children's Conceptions of Gears , 1998 .

[36]  Joan M. Ryder,et al.  Integrating cognitive task analysis into instructional systems development , 1993 .

[37]  Zoubeida R. Dagher,et al.  Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change , 1994 .

[38]  Joseph A. Cavese An Analogue for the Cell. , 1976 .

[39]  Patsye Peebles,et al.  Patterns of Conceptual Change in Evolution , 1996 .

[40]  David E. Brown Refocusing Core Intuitions: A Concretizing Role for Analogy in Conceptual Change. , 1993 .

[41]  Steven W. Gilbert,et al.  An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts , 1989 .

[42]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Changes in Students' Understanding of Evolution Resulting from Different Curricular and Instructional Strategies. , 1996 .

[43]  Z. Dagher Analysis of analogies used by science teachers , 1995 .

[44]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[45]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: a synthesis , 1989 .