This article studies the use of the sample distribution for the prediction of finite population totals under single-stage sampling. The proposed predictors employ the sample values of the target study variable, the sampling weights of the sample units and possibly known population values of auxiliary variables. The prediction problem is solved by estimating the expectation of the study values for units outside the sample as a function of the corresponding expectation under the sample distribution and the sampling weights. The prediction mean square error is estimated by a combination of an inverse sampling procedure and a re-sampling method. An interesting outcome of the present analysis is that several familiar estimators in common use are shown to be special cases of the proposed approach, thus providing them a new interpretation. The performance of the new and some old predictors in common use is evaluated and compared by a Monte Carlo simulation study using a real data set. The sample distribution is the parametric distribution of the outcome values for units included in the sample. This distribution is different from the population distribution if the sample selection probabilities are correlated with the values of the study variable even when conditioning on the values of concomitant variables included in the population model. It is also different from the randomization (design) distribution that accounts for all the possible sample selections with the population values held fixed. The sample distribution is defined and discussed with examples in Pfeffermann, Krieger and Rinott (1998), and is further investigated in Pfeffermann and Sverchkov (1999) who use it for the estimation of linear regression models. Krieger and Pfeffermann (1997) use the sample distribution for testing population distribution functions and Pfeffermann and Sverchkov (2003a) discuss its use for fitting Generalized Linear Models. Chambers, Dorfman and Sverchkov (2003) utilize the sample distribution for nonparametric estimation of regression models, and Kim (2002) and Pfeffermann and Sverchkov (2003b) apply it for small area estimation problems. In this article we study the use of the sample distribution for the prediction of finite population totals under single- stage sampling. It is assumed that the population outcome values (the y-values) are random realizations from some distribution that conditions on known values of auxiliary variables (the x-values). The problem considered is the prediction of the population total Y based on the sample y-values, the sampling weights for units in the sample and the population x-values. The use of the sample distribution permits conditioning on all these values, which is not possible under the randomization (design) distribution, and the prediction of Y is equivalent therefore to the prediction of the y-values for units outside the sample. The prediction problem is solved by estimating the conditional expectation of the y-values (given the x-values) for units outside the sample as a function of the conditional sample expectation (the expectation under the sample distribution) and the sampling weights. The prediction mean square error is estimated by a combination of an inverse sampling procedure and a re-sampling method. As it turns out, several familiar estimators in common use and in particular, classical design based estimators are special cases of the proposed procedure, thus providing them a new interpretation. The performance of the new and old predictors is evaluated and compared by mean of a Monte Carlo simulation study using a real data set.
[1]
D. Pfeffermann.
The Role of Sampling Weights when Modeling Survey Data
,
1993
.
[2]
Danny Pfeffermann,et al.
PARAMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS OF COMPLEX SURVEY DATA UNDER INFORMATIVE PROBABILITY SAMPLING
,
1998
.
[3]
R. Royall.
On finite population sampling theory under certain linear regression models
,
1970
.
[4]
Edward L. Korn,et al.
Examples of Differing Weighted and Unweighted Estimates from a Sample Survey
,
1995
.
[5]
Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.
On π-inverse weighting versus best linear unbiased weighting in probability sampling
,
1980
.
[6]
Robert Chambers,et al.
NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION WITH COMPLEX SURVEY DATA
,
2003
.
[7]
Small area estimation under informative sampling
,
2003
.
[8]
K. R. W. Brewer,et al.
RATIO ESTIMATION AND FINITE POPULATIONS: SOME RESULTS DEDUCIBLE FROM THE ASSUMPTION OF AN UNDERLYING STOCHASTIC PROCESS
,
1963
.
[9]
K. Brewer.
Cosmetic calibration with unequal probability sampling
,
2000
.
[10]
Morris H. Hansen,et al.
An Evaluation of Model-Dependent and Probability-Sampling Inferences in Sample Surveys: Rejoinder
,
1983
.
[11]
THE METHODOLOGY OF THE WORKPLACE AND EMPLOYEE SURVEY
,
2002
.