Protean graphs with a variety of ranking schemes

We introduce a new class of random graph models for complex real-world networks, based on the protean graph model by Luczak and Pralat. Our generalized protean graph models have two distinguishing features. First, they are not growth models, but instead are based on the assumption that a ''steady state'' of large but finite size has been reached. Second, the models assume that the vertices are ranked according to a given ranking scheme, and the rank of a vertex determines the probability that that vertex receives a link in a given time step. Precisely, the link probability is proportional to the rank raised to the power [email protected], where the attachment strength @a is a tunable parameter. We show that the model leads to a power law degree distribution with exponent 1+1/@a for ranking schemes based on a given prestige label, or on the degree of a vertex. We also study a scheme where each vertex receives an initial rank chosen randomly according to a biased distribution. In this case, the degree distribution depends on the distribution of the initial rank. For one particular choice of parameters we obtain a power law with an exponent that depends both on @a and on a parameter determining the initial rank distribution.

[1]  Anthony Bonato,et al.  A course on the Web graph , 2008 .

[2]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Scale-free network growth by ranking. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[3]  Christian Borgs,et al.  First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness , 2007, STOC '07.

[4]  Jonathan L. Gross,et al.  Handbook of graph theory , 2007, Discrete mathematics and its applications.

[5]  Nicholas C. Wormald,et al.  Growing Protean Graphs , 2007, Internet Math..

[6]  Svante Janson,et al.  Random graphs , 2000, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization.

[7]  Pawel Pralat,et al.  Rank-Based Attachment Leads to Power Law Graphs , 2010, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[8]  Elisa Schae Review of a course on the web graph by Anthony Bonato (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, USA) , 2009, SIGA.

[9]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[10]  Svante Janson,et al.  Random graphs , 2000, ZOR Methods Model. Oper. Res..

[11]  S. Ross A random graph , 1981 .

[12]  N. Wormald The differential equation method for random graph processes and greedy algorithms , 1999 .

[13]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Tomasz Luczak,et al.  Protean Graphs , 2006, Internet Math..

[15]  Pawe L Pra Lat,et al.  A NOTE ON THE DIAMETER OF PROTEAN GRAPHS , 2007 .

[16]  Pawel Pralat The diameter of protean graphs , 2008, Discret. Math..

[17]  F. Chung,et al.  Complex Graphs and Networks , 2006 .

[18]  Pawe L Pra Lat,et al.  CONNECTIVITY THRESHOLD AND RECOVERY TIME IN RANK-BASED MODELS FOR COMPLEX NETWORKS , 2011 .

[19]  Nicholas C. Wormald,et al.  Random graphs and asymptotics , 2004 .

[20]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  Sudden Emergence of a Giantk-Core in a Random Graph , 1996, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[21]  Pawe L Pra Lat,et al.  Protean Graphs with a Variety of Ranking Schemes , 2008, COCOA.