Estimating vowel formant discrimination thresholds using a single-interval classification task.

Previous research estimating vowel formant discrimination thresholds in words and sentences has often employed a modified two-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) task with adaptive tracking. Although this approach has produced stable data, the length and number of experimental sessions, as well as the unnaturalness of the task, limit generalizations of results to ordinary speech communication. In this exploratory study, a typical identification task was used to estimate vowel formant discrimination thresholds. Specifically, a signal detection theory approach was used to develop a method to estimate vowel formant discrimination thresholds from a quicker, more natural single-interval classification task. In experiment 1 "classification thresholds" for words in isolation and embedded in sentences were compared to previously collected 2AFC data. Experiment 2 used a within-subjects design to compare thresholds estimated from both classification and 2AFC tasks. Due to instabilities observed in the experiment 1 sentence data, experiment 2 examined only isolated words. Results from these experiments show that for isolated words, thresholds estimated using the classification procedure are comparable to those estimated using the 2AFC task. These results, as well as an analysis of several aspects of the classification procedure, support the viability of this new approach for estimating discrimination thresholds for speech stimuli.

[1]  B. Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels * , 2022 .

[2]  Diane Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[4]  Diane Kewley-Port,et al.  STRAIGHT: A new speech synthesizer for vowel formant discrimination , 2004 .

[5]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[6]  P. Iverson Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  S. Harnad Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition , 1990 .

[8]  D. Pisoni Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[9]  L. Humes,et al.  The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A. Lotto,et al.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D Kewley-Port Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Schouten,et al.  Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D Kewley-Port,et al.  Auditory models of formant frequency discrimination for isolated vowels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel perception by noise masked normal-hearing young adults. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel formant discrimination: towards more ordinary listening conditions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Repp Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings , 1984 .

[20]  Discrimination and identification of vowels by young, hearing-impaired adults. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  C. Watson,et al.  Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..